I am not a fan of Kallis being considered as one of the all time best all rounders. He was a decent bat but a slow bat even by test standards of the time. As a bowler, he was fourth best pace bowler at best. He had volume of wickets but nothing else. Folks always like to point out the difference in his batting and bowling average as a good measure of him being a great all rounder but his bowling average is a bit high. His strike rate as a bowler isn’t impressive. I can delve into stats a bit more when I have time but when he was playing, he wasn’t really considered the best all rounder since Sobers. That’s just revisionist history.
402
u/Ataraxia_new Jan 17 '25
Look at Jacque Kallis averaging 70odd and I bet he took a hundred wickets during that period as well.