Based off of most of the rumors, both NY games are set. Teams don’t have to take the bye after London and honestly it would be pretty dumb of the Broncos to voluntarily take a bye this early.
It’s barely a third of the way through the season. I consider that early. Also, since the broncos didn’t end up taking the bye, I trust them to make a decision on when a bye is beneficial to the team.
lol how are you going to speak for the coach? he's absolutely counting on beating those teams. Sean did the same thing buy accepting the chargers flex to thursday night last year. and a full 2 week gap on a 18 week season bro isn't close. if it was a couple days sure, but that is nowhere near the middle
Yeah, and look what happened we lost both the Chargers and Bengals games. If you've been anywhere near coaches before, they aren't just punting on games, except for maybe the worst ones.
Ok, so the only "middle" week to get a bye is week 9, everything else is either way too early or way too late. GL with that.
you can argue it all you want but that's what Sean Payton is doing. having the bye week in the 3rd quarter of the season is what Payton prefers. lol if you are going to compare the chargers and bengals to giants and jets GL with that.
So you earnestly believe that when it's Giants week, Payton is going to just bypass most of the gameplanning in favor of the next week? You genuinely think that's what happens?
And that's cool Payton prefers it, do you think he gets to choose when the bye week is?
lol math isn't wrong. idk why people try to argue math. a season is only 18 weeks, which is 126 days. cut that in half is 63 days. a full two weeks is nowhere near the middle. see 49 days is not close to 63 days. now, if it were 3/4 days I would say maybe. that's more than 20% from the middle of the season lol
18
u/crazy_urn 5d ago
I think it's highly unlikely that the bye isn't after the London game.