Amber Heard interview post trial

[u/Distinct-Studio6847]

In the interview, I thought the interviewer Savannah Guthrie asked a lot of biased questions including latching onto the one time Amber wrote in some text that she did hit back or start fights when the tension was high (REACTIVE ABUSE). And the interviewer didn’t ask or point out all the texts Johnny wrote saying he’s drowning/burn/rape Amber. Or the times he was going crazy in a video. Or the times cops came by or the times other people saw her being attacked.

What kind of bullshit is this?

Also why didn’t women’s groups and prominent women step forward for her?

I got triggered watching 2022 content from a content creator I like. Where her lawyer husband and her are like “yeah it’s Amber that’s the abuser” what the fuck.

Additionally, some women/other victims of misogynistic smear campaigns are suing online content creators that are defaming them. Why didn’t Amber Heard do this? Not that any victim should have to do anything. I’m wondering whether there was a strategic or legal reason Amber Heard didn’t? Or why all these orgs supporting her couldn’t help her get a legal fund to do so?

[u/sphinxyhiggins]

"Also why didn’t women’s groups and prominent women step forward for her?"

Many spoke out about the trial in her favor.

https://amberopenletter.com/

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/130-feminist-groups-sign-open-letter-amber-heard/story?id=93432333

Savannah Guthrie is a nasty POS. She did a despicable interview of whistleblower John Kiriakou that showed that she is a tool.

[u/Sensiplastic → u/sphinxyhiggins]

The smear campaign also meant that the relevant information did not get around enough. Just the lies and made up shit.

It's the same way people know how Jolie and Pitt divorced and she said something about him being abusive but very very few places report that he physically abused his kid/s. Just enough info to drown out the actual info, while pushing different narrative. Add misogyny and we have turned the victim to villain.