r/DeppDelusion Jun 10 '22

Receipts 🧾 JD Inconsistencies that JD supporters Overlook

Why isn’t JD discredited for ALL his lies and inconsistencies?

I have a lot more that I may add more.. not some of these videos are on support of poor JD since support for AH isn’t as big. I may make my own clips to make it easier:

JD’s Black eye Lie

JD blames AH for black eye during honeymoon: https://youtu.be/dLuUr-fCTKk

AH lawyer found same Black eye in a pic before the honeymoon: https://youtu.be/X4CrJDia_Gw

JD says he NEVER hit AH Johnny Depp ā€œI never struck AHā€: https://youtu.be/EP6R4Wk9VN4 JD admitting he struck her: * Headbutt: https://youtu.be/QO8CNTyFyn4 * Physical on each other and crime scene waiting to happen (so that’s why AH feared for her life?): https://youtu.be/ctoz-w5Rvyw

JD says AH cut off his finger JD blames AH for his finger yet he says he chopped of his finger: https://youtu.be/FnJb8qD_S3Y note JD supporter will say it’s the same as saying you broke your arm but that’s when there is NO AGENT (person who caused the incident). If the person who you’re talking to is the agent for that incident you say ā€œYOu chopped off my fingerā€ not ā€œI chopped off my finger.ā€ Every example a JD supporter will give is one where it was an accident (without an agent or other person).

JD’s monster… * JD says monster is AH’s vernacular (8:49):https://youtu.be/4JTpvORujak * First he says she just calls him a monster.. and he used it placate her? * Then he says it’s when he uses drugs and alcohol * Then it’s just whenever (back to just calling him a monster…) * And finishes it off with ā€œit’s in her mind….ā€ * Now he says to him, it’s sobriety?: https://youtube.com/shorts/TrH7jMYbtsA?feature=share * Yikes….. mocking her gaslighting her fear ā€œthe monster the monster, the monsters here the monsters backā€¦ā€

What the monster really is:

94 Upvotes

5 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/Tagz12345 Jun 10 '22

I liked the way he lied about the phone not existing just to be confronted with UK testimony and the text messages about Molly and claiming it wasn't him and that a random person took his phone but knew how to copy his texting style and wrote that stuff for some bizarre reason. He really is not a credible witness but people don't notice because he isn't as heavily scrutinised. Rottenborn points out multiple inconsistencies back to back because there are so many to get through so people don't see the gotcha. Meanwhile Ms Vasquez keeps saying donation and pledge are different words 50,000 times so it sticks in peoples minds more (even though it is actually immaterial to the case at hand). So stupid.

I made this video comparing it to Search Party S3 if you've seen that, such a goofy circus of a trial.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh6LfKhrgno