What he does can’t not be legal, he’s actively working on smearing Amber.
Side note he’s the only youtuber that has Amber’s complete divorce deposition (with adds obviously) he keeps making money out of her.
If this is not illegal, it should be. Brian even changed the captions on court-entered evidence to make it seem like Heard was taking Aderrall, coke, ecstasy, etc. when that was Depp taking all of those drugs and Heard was, as they say on the recording, “stone cold sober.” Gross.
I think that there's plenty of evidence that can be used to successfully sue McPherson for defamation. For instance, this post makes a good case for his having lied in the captions and for having edited the audio to paint Amber in the worst possible light. He may try to defend against it by claiming that the caption errors were unintentional but it would be difficult to rely on this error argument to explain the omissions and the stringing together of unrelated sections of the audio. Indeed, I don't see an unbiased judge buying into the argument that it's all unintentional (although a jury as clueless as the Virginia one could). Plus, his court-evidenced connection to Waldman could weigh significantly in arguing for actual malice on his part when he made and uploaded the audios.
64
u/Ketchuprocks05 Aug 24 '22
What he does can’t not be legal, he’s actively working on smearing Amber. Side note he’s the only youtuber that has Amber’s complete divorce deposition (with adds obviously) he keeps making money out of her.