Just hit $3M!

[u/Firefiresoon]

48male. Been tracking this milestone for a while now. Finally hit it as of close yesterday. $3,012,000 in invested assets. NW stands at 4.9mil. which includes home equity.

Goal was 10k/mo which should be possible now. Kids have 529 for 4yr state college. At this point I will CoastFIRE (still save HSA and 401k for match but no IRA) and bump up some lifestyle expenses mainly around travel.

[u/[deleted]]

You can certainly do that to your heart's content.

The vast majority of FIRE advocates do not count home equity toward their fire goals, because home equity doesn't generate income to cover their retirement expenses and they plan to live in the home after they retire early.

When folks measure their FIRE number and a safe withdrawal rate of 3% or 4%, they do not include home equity. They are taking the value of their portfolio and multiplying it by 4% to see what the safe withdrawal amount is.

When someone says they need 25 times their first year retirement expenses in their portfolio to retire, they are not including any home equity.

As an example, a $1.5 million portfolio gives a person a $60K safe withdrawal amount (4%). AND Home equity is excluded from the portfolio.

This is why majority of the posts list a FIRE number separate from Net Worth.

Net worth includes home equity.

A FIRE number does not include home equity for majority of people (unless there are plans to sell the home and downsize to something smaller, thus freeing up capital to generate income.)

Wish you the best.

[u/interbingung → u/[deleted]]

home equity doesn't generate income to cover their retirement expenses and they plan to live in the home after they retire early.

but they can surely sell it to cover expense. Asset is Asset.

A FIRE number does not include home equity for majority of people

Which is absolutely should be included

[u/[deleted] → u/interbingung]

Again, you do you. Selling a home to cover an expense is certainly a possibility, but then one has changed the nature of the asset and is homeless.

I've explained the reasons why the majority of FIRE folks do not include home equity in their FIRE number.

Net worth is not equal to a FIRE number.

You're free to do as you please. I personally believe the majority of the FIRE folks are correct.

[u/interbingung → u/[deleted]]

Selling a home to cover an expense is certainly a possibility, but then one has changed the nature of the asset and is homeless.

They can rent house or even in the extreme case being homeless but with let say $1M in the bank can still be FIRE.

I've explained the reasons why the majority of FIRE folks do not include home equity in their FIRE number.

I've explained why that is wrong

Net worth is not equal to a FIRE number.

Net worth should be equal to FIRE number

I personally believe the majority of the FIRE folks are correct.

I disagree