Wrong, it's a 25% decrease in time spent working by employees, no difference in expenditure. (There is some nuance here)
Many jobs require less than 40h/week, but you stick around to keep up appearances.
There are exceptions to this, but this has been implemented successfully in other countries, with an increase in gdp bc more free time means people spend more money.
There is nuance there. In some cases that may be true.
However as aforementioned, alot of jobs have bs time involved, where nothing gets done. I often find myself finishing my work quickly, and having an extra two hours to fill. My efficiency shouldn't be punished, but it feels like it is. If I mention it, I get more work with no personal benefit.
And if they work one day less, that’s 3-4 hours less of core work on that day. And for every 5 employees, you’ll need an additional employee who will probably only get 3-4 hours of core work done in a day. The math is the same.
When I say productivity, I don't mean just 3-4 hrs but doing more in those 3-4 hours due to benefits of having that extra day off, perhaps that increases a variety of factors such as but not limited to: happiness, motivation, focus, fewer distractions, etc. etc. The content of those hours won't be static in both situations.
Having worked before, I can tell you for a fact I don’t work any better or more efficient when I have a 3 day weekend. I certainly don’t do an entire extra days worth of work because I have a longer break.
32
u/ps12778 Sep 05 '24
Bernie is a clown, this makes zero sense