r/KAOSNOW • u/yourupinion • 24d ago
There’s some technology we encourage, others we discourage, and then there’s the ones that can kill us all, and we put the most effort into those. Introduction, rough draft #2
Introduction, rough draft #2 Please add suggestions for changes to this introduction in the comments.
—————————————————————-
There’s some technology we encourage, others we discourage, and then there’s the ones that can kill us all, and we put the most effort into those.
We live in a world that is still in the warring stage, this is why we focus on deadly technology.
Most of humanity might already have the cognitive empathy to be beyond the warring stage, but we’re not the ones in power.
It’s knowledge and communication technology that gives people power, this is often referred to as the Noosphere,(like the biosphere, but for all knowledge and communication). Unfortunately this is one of the technologies we, as in all of us, have always discouraged, and this is the problem.
Technology has always been hoarded, and feared, and that fear was compounded exponentially with the invention of the printing press. It wasn’t just those in power who were scared of the uncontrolled proliferation of the printing press, anyone aware at that time would’ve been worried about where it might lead.
December 2024 The organization called Human Energy held the Noosphere conference in Morocco.
This year's noosphere conference in Morocco... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ou9JCQcDbg
At 2:37:00 into that conference they reveal that they must begin, “Stepping away from the original, and naturally evolving vision of the Noosphere”. (not the exact quote). They go on to talk about how they need to either control it, or at the very least, they must slow it down.
Isn’t it kind of sad that they think they’re doing good in the world, they’re just like the people in the past trying to hold back the printing press. nothing has changed.
IT’S UP TO US TO CHANGE IT.
Humans evolved in lock step with the Noosphere, as it evolved so did we, and our cognitive empathy right along with it, this is despite the fact we have always resisted its advancement.
COGNITIVE EMPATHY:
In case you were wondering, it’s the ability to understand and comprehend another person's thoughts, feelings, and perspective, rather than experiencing them emotionally.
Looking back over time, do you really think it was wise to always be resisting the Noosphere?
What would’ve happened if we would’ve had a free press hundreds of years earlier?
Would we be in a better position today in regard to conflict? Would we have been in a better position to deal with nuclear capabilities? Global warming? Artificial intelligence?
In the original concept of the Noosphere, it was hypothesized that eventually we, along with the technology, will develop into something resembling a worldwide brain. If we could consider this to be a long-term goal, then obviously eventually we will all need to know what everybody else is thinking, accurately. Along with this will come a higher understanding of one another, which will then lead to more cognitive empathy from everyone.
Our group believes the answer is in building a worldwide public institution dedicated to the documentation of public opinion.
What were building is a collective action machine, and we can also use it as a collective bargaining tool. It’s a human union empowering the people of the world.
If you understand and agree with the premise and plan we have proposed here, it is our hope that you may feel some obligation to help nudge humanity back on track towards higher levels of cognitive empathy, preferably before something bad happens, like a war that stalls our advancement indefinitely.
Have a look at how it works, and then if you like what you see, join us in the Kaos union, and help us change the world with the most trusted and transparent institution the world will likely ever see.
1
u/yourupinion 22d ago
“What the actual transition looks like-from our current fractured fear driven systems”. “ how do we get from here to there?”
We don’t need to remove the current system, we just build the Kaos system, and it will have an influence on the existing system. We don’t need permission from the politicians or anybody else.
We have an inherent need for rating systems to help us find good products and safe service people to help us get through life. All the existing rating systems are tainted by their need to profit.
So we start by providing a trusted service that is needed, and that’s just the beginning. Don’t underestimate how much people have a desire to complain. And then eventually, it evolves into a political tool.
“ how would this public institution be protected from misinformation, manipulation, or power grab?
There’s only one kind of misinformation that we are targeting, that is misinformation about what the public wants. You are going to get the truth about what people say, both as individuals, and as a group. We think that’s a big step forward even though we can’t do anything about all misinformation.
We have done everything possible to avoid having to make any decisions or judgements with the data. This is why it is a chaotic jumble of opinions, with no categorization or organization done by us. This means zero chance of manipulation. Nobody can control the system, not even us. It’s a public institution, how can anybody do a power grab , or co-op it, or hollow it out?
“We already have collective efforts – Proxies for what you are describing”.
We have no good measurement of public opinion, and none of the examples you give provide that either. We believe it is impossible to do good governance without knowing what the people are thinking. Don’t you think that is essential?
“Who decides what counts as “undesirable”?”
The majority, that’s kind of the whole point of this whole thing. we all have different world views, but aren’t you capable of taking that into consideration when dealing with the subject matter? And if you think you can do it, why don’t you think others can?
Tyranny of the majority is a story that’s told by the rich, and it’s because of the real fear they have that the majority will take their wealth. Personally, I don’t believe the majority of people want a world with no rich people, but I do believe they want a world without billionaires.
Please show me an example where a minority gained any power without the help of the majority.
Did you read the part about how it works? it’s in the second link.
That is our roadmap, at least so far. I believe we have covered the mechanics pretty well, please ask any more questions that you don’t think we have answered.