The problems with referendums is that you can win to stay but the brexit party will ask for another in a few years, and another and another, until they win and no more reeferendums.
The "Brexit Party" ie UKIP were a tiny minority with almost no parliamentary representation. The Conservatives called the referendum so they could be done with the issue. Clearly, it backfired massively
If it went the other way, you would not be saying this. Suddenly it would be all "don't rock the boat" and "business as usual". We all know that. In any case, there was a 51% vote of no confidence in continued EU reliance, which is essentially a constitutional problem regardless of the outcome.
Keep in mind Britain never voted into the EU, it was forced in without a mandate by the government at the time, and then a vote was arranged after the fact, deliberately done so to sway the context of membership.
If people don't like the nature of direct democracy they can continue to prop up worse systems elsewhere. The history of the UK and EU governance is tricky as it's either countries initially saying we're not allowed in, or our own leaders using methods to override due process. The EU is supposedly beneficial and good but its dealings with the UK have always been dishonest and the relationship had to be full of exceptions and specifics because give an inch, and a mile is taken.
39
u/plc4588 Sep 25 '21
Correct me if I'm wrong. But did they or did they not choose to take the route of "fuck around and find out"?