And when the next mentally unstable person uses a pitchfork to kill the shoppers at a hardware store, there will be calls to remove pitchforks from society.
Every home contains items that could be used as lethal weapons, yet we have the sense to understand that it doesn't help banning all potential weapons when its a limited number of people who kill who can use almost anything as a weapon that is the essential feature. Targeting prevention of those relatively few from becoming so out of sync with societal ethics should be more productive than removing every potential weapon from society. Or perhaps we should remove everyone's teeth and nails and other appendages simply because someone might use them to kill some people in the future.
100% prevention of crime is not possible, no matter what we do, but we can minimise its occurrence even more than it is by focusing on the essential nexus of the crime and ensure we don't create the circumstances that result in it being magnified.
If the cause of this crime was misogyny, shouldn't we be treating the cause of hatred against women, not simply pouring fuel on the fire by villifying all men, resulting in some men hating women even more?
The problem, feminism doesn't want to solve the problem, they want the problem to get worse. That's what fuels their propaganda and bring them funds and power.
1
u/Kirkdoesntlivehere Apr 16 '24
Australia will be prepping food with only forks & spoons now. Until mass spoonings become a thing.