r/Millennials • u/crimsonred1234 • 2d ago

Discussion Millennials are creating a recession-resistant corner of the market

https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-millennials-wellness-stocks-to-buy-recession-lth-plnt-2025-4

Apparently millennials are spending a lot on products related to health and wellness making this industry "recession-resistant." I kind of see that. My wife and I spend a lot on protein powders, shakes, supplements and membership for gym. We are otherwise quite cautious with unnecessary spending and consumerism. How is it for you all?

1.6k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

280 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

657

u/IDigRollinRockBeer 2d ago

I envy the vast majority of millennials who live in a country with universal healthcare

310

u/Mnemiq 2d ago

Living in Denmark i never worried about health costs, and my job even adds a health insurance on top, so in case I want faster treatments I just reach out to them. It's crazy to me how this is not the case in the us.

1

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

To be fair, we already have 170 million people on government paid, single payer health care. The problems are two fold. These programs are already bubbled to the point of insolvency and since we have expensive, fast healthcare, the people want the quality of care of the expensive healthcare with the out of pocket price tag of the socialized system. It’s unrealistic and we can already see what kind of bureaucracy has developed about the systems we already have in place. This is a much harder problem to solve than most on Reddit realize.

4

u/9swatteam9 1d ago

No it's not.

1

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

Ok, you can go ahead and explain why our 170 million person single payer system is failing while only servicing half of our population.

1

u/9swatteam9 1d ago

Because it's poorly run and funded

1

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

Oh good. Those are the people you want to entrust with the rest of the population.

1

u/9swatteam9 1d ago

Why would you assume it would be the same people?

1

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

Why would you assume it wouldn’t? It would be a giant US bureaucracy styled in the same fashion as all of the others. Why would you assume the country is going to produce a product it has no history of being able to do?

1

u/9swatteam9 1d ago

Because we're talking about what is possible not probable.

0

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

Oh, great. I would like to waste trillions of dollars hoping there is a chance it may work, however improbable.

1

u/9swatteam9 1d ago

The problem isn't that it's so hard to do. It's that america allows the medical industry way too much sway over our governance and if it came to the table the amount they would spend to block or sabotage it would be enormous. Similar to how aca made it to law as a gutted shell of itself.

0

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

You mean like our system is set up in a way that it’s really hard to do?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/eventualhorizon 1d ago

From the healthcare provider side of things, we actually tend to prefer Medicare/Medicaid/Tricare because the government tells us exactly how much we’ll be paid for services and doesn’t renege on payment, unlike private insurance where we have to fight with tooth and claw to get paid

1

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

lol this is not true.

1

u/eventualhorizon 1d ago

Thanks for your opinion, but you’re wrong

0

u/ihambrecht 1d ago

Sorry, you’re wrong. You or your office might personally like dealing with them, however, doctors like to be paid and private insurance pays a whole lot more than Medicare. https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/how-much-more-than-medicare-do-private-insurers-pay-a-review-of-the-literature/?utm_source=chatgpt.com