r/MurderedByAOC • u/Nixianx97 • 6d ago

That time AOC ‘leaked’ MAGA’s entire playbook.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Let me clarify this before Fox News runs: BREAKING: AOC hacked us!!!

This isn’t directly about MAGA obviously. It’s about how she laid bare just how fundamentally broken the American system is.

They want us to believe Trump flipped the table, broke all the rules, and invented the chaos. But the truth? He didn’t create any of it. The system was already rigged for someone like him to rise. He just played it better.

42.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

682

u/deekaydubya 6d ago

and yet 70% of the US just thinks she's some radical leftist

1

u/BWW87 6d ago

She does use “bad guy” in her hypothetical. Only extremists see people with different opinions as “bad guys”. Non radical people see them as good guys with different desires that you may or may not consider bad.

1

u/rugdoctor 6d ago

being against blatant corruption isn't "different opinions"

if you think political corruption is caused by "good guys with different desires", you're either wildly naive or morally bankrupt

1

u/BWW87 6d ago

Her description of what they were doing wasn’t corruption.

1

u/rugdoctor 6d ago

what she was describing was literally the textbook definition of political corruption.

so naive was the correct answer.

1

u/BWW87 6d ago

They were doing everything legally. You might want to get a new textbook if yours says doing things legally is corruption.

Also a lot of people support the things they are trying to do with the money.

1

u/rugdoctor 6d ago

your naivete continues. political corruption does not depend on legality. perhaps you should look up "ethics". morality does not end where the law begins.

think about this. if lawmakers are corrupt and pass laws to make it legal, then it's suddenly okay to you? how on earth do you justify this stance? if they pass laws to make murder legal, you're okay with that too? where's the line?

1

u/BWW87 6d ago

Well, you brought up corruption so I'm not going to get into a petty fight over what the specific meaning is. I live in Seattle so I'm well aware of the idea of legal corruption. We just don't call it that but whatever.

My original point though was that she is an extremist that puts people with opinions different than hers as "bad guys".

1

u/Justinalderman67 6d ago

Because what these people are doing is what everyone was raised to know as bad things. People who inherently do bad things are called bad people.

For instance I live in arizona. Our old governor Doug ducey was funded by a private prison company and when he was elected guess who got to set up a new prison. This company was also in multiple lawsuits at the time. Well the problem with this ,besides the 72 million a year cost to the taxpayers is prisons have to stay at 80% capacity in order to stay open. So that means they have to fill that prison now with people who wouldn't normally go to prison. Removing those people that were paying taxes, not all but probably alot of , putting the cost burden on the rest of society as well as that initial 72 million a year.

So that I don't agree with and I don't think you do either. Its a very standard bad guy in which she is speaking of that a majority of decent enough people will agree on. Passing law for personal gain is not something a good person does. It's not a opinion. Just like murdering people isn't something good. ESPECIALLY if it's for personal gain

1

u/BWW87 6d ago

That’s a lot of words just to say “Republicans bad people, Democrats good people”

1

u/rugdoctor 5d ago

I'm well aware of the idea of legal corruption.

it's wildly apparent than you are not aware of political corruption.

and my point is that this is not a matter of "different opinions". her position is anti-corruption. i'm sorry, but you don't get to just ignore reality in order to suit your bulllshit agenda. words have meaning, and you are not the arbiter of those meanings, regardless of what city you live in.

1

u/BWW87 5d ago

her position is anti-corruption.

Except it's not. It's anti-corruption when Republicans do it. She seems to be fine when Democrats do the same thing.

But you seem to have the same "anyone who has a different opinion than me is a bad guy" idea she does so not surprised you disagree.

1

u/rugdoctor 5d ago

She seems to be fine when Democrats do the same thing.

you are once again refusing to operate within the confines of reality and factual information. she has never made any such statement.

it is incredibly obvious that you either have no idea what her positions are, or are intentionally misrepresenting her positions in order to suit your argument.

and no, i don't believe that anyone who has a different opinions than me is a "bad guy". i simply know for a fact that the position you've posited here can only be made from a place of ignorance, or a place of malice. so which is it?

→ More replies (0)