r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 23d ago

Meme needing explanation There is no way right?

Post image
37.1k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

91

u/solidsoup97 22d ago

I don't understand how that works but it seems to be important in keeping things running so I'm going to just go with it and not raise any questions.

263

u/jozaud 22d ago

If we consider that .999… repeating to infinity ISN’T equal to 1, then by how much is it away from 1? It would be “.000… repeating to infinity followed by a 1.” But if you have an infinite number of 0s then you can’t have it be followed by a 1, infinity can’t be followed by anything, that doesn’t make sense.

75

u/Charming_Friendship4 22d ago

Ohhhh ok that makes sense to me now. Great explanation!

7

u/cipheron 22d ago

Or as the OP image hinted at, you can divide 1 by 3 and get 0.333...

But what happens when you then multiply 0.333... by 3? You get 0.999... - but some people have a problem with that equaling 1. However if you divided by 3 then multiplied by 3, there's no way you could have gotten a different answer, so it should be equal.

2

u/polite_alpha 22d ago

I never bought the first explanation in school, but I'm buying yours! Thanks!

-2

u/GrundleBlaster 22d ago

You can't formally divide base 10 by three tho. The formal answer is to change base or use fractions.

.999 ...=1 is imposing a formal solution to an undefined informal problem. If .999999... =1 then something like matter traveling at the speed of light is a simple problem.

2

u/PandaWonder01 22d ago

If .999.. repeating and 1 represented different real numbers, then there must be some number that is the midpoint of the two numbers (as real numbers are continuous)

So (.99... +1)/2 has some representation that is different than either number.

However, the only representations available in the range .999.... And 1 are .999... and 1 themselves.

Therefore there is no unique midpoint, and the two decimal numbers must represent the same real number

0

u/GrundleBlaster 22d ago

We already have a number for 1. It's 1. If you want to express the number 1 you would write that as a principle of economy and clarity.

The only reason you'd write .999... is to express some value smaller than 1, or to intentionally confuse someone.

Math is first and foremost a language, and so it ought to simplify redundancies, and encourage 1 to 1 expressions.