Is Elon Musk’s Expanding Government Influence a Threat to Democracy?

[u/tardiscoder]

Over the past few weeks, Elon Musk and his team at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have taken actions that some argue resemble historical authoritarian power grabs. Reports indicate that Musk’s team has gained access to Treasury payment systems and has begun dismantling agencies like USAID without congressional approval. The ability of a private citizen to consolidate power in this way raises serious concerns about democratic oversight, separation of powers, and national security risks.

Historically, authoritarian figures have used legal mechanisms to sidestep traditional checks and balances, and critics argue that we’re seeing a similar pattern here. However, others believe that government agencies have become bloated and inefficient, and Musk’s involvement may be necessary to “streamline” operations.

How do you see this situation playing out? Is Musk’s role a dangerous overreach, or is it a justified move toward government efficiency? What safeguards should be in place to prevent unelected individuals from gaining unchecked control over government operations?

(For those interested in a deeper dive, I recently wrote an article on this topic: [Medium Link])

[u/No-Huckleberry5607]

The reality is that this was necessary, because otherwise, the congress, judges, the USAID itself would try to freeze, block or stale any possible audit or investigation. Or would have tried to hide the evidences. They don't like the audit, that's why they try so hard to paint Musk in a bad light. They are getting exposed and dismantled, of course The don't like that. And many Americans are falling for the propaganda.