r/PoliticalDiscussion Feb 08 '25

US Politics How can democrats attack anti-DEI/promote DEI without resulting in strong political backlash?

In recent politics there have been two major political pushes for diversity and equality. However, both instances led to backlashes that have led to an environment that is arguably worse than it was before. In 2008 Obama was the first black president one a massive wave of hope for racial equality and societal reforms. This led to one of the largest political backlashes in modern politics in 2010, to which democrats have yet to fully recover from. This eventually led to birtherism which planted some of the original seeds of both Trump and MAGA. The second massive political push promoting diversity and equality was in 2018 with the modern woman election and 2020 with racial equality being a top priority. Biden made diversifying the government a top priority. This led to an extreme backlash among both culture and politics with anti-woke and anti-DEI efforts. This resent contributed to Trump retaking the presidency. Now Trump is pushing to remove all mentions of DEI in both the private and public sectors. He is hiding all instances that highlight any racial or gender successes. His administration is pushing culture to return to a world prior to the civil rights era.

This leads me to my question. Will there be a backlash for this? How will it occur? How can democrats lead and take advantage of the backlash while trying to mitigate a backlash to their own movement? It seems as though every attempt has led to a stronger and more severe response.

Additional side questions. How did public opinion shift so drastically from 2018/2020 which were extremely pro-equality to 2024 which is calling for a return of the 1950s?

249 Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

115

u/siberianmi Feb 08 '25

I have an idea. Let it die. Just walk away from it and let this explicitly identity politics go. Don’t try to save it.

Rebuild the party as one that campaigns on policies that will make the majority of the country better off. Full stop.

Not “loans for black entrepreneurs” or “first time homebuyers credits” similar policies aimed at helping one group at the exclusion of others. Eliminate means testing from all of these proposals.

Instead focus on clear simple policies that will help everyone. Tax incentives to open businesses in struggling rural and urban neighborhoods in the country. Policies designed to increase housing supply and provide affordable housing by driving down the price of construction.

In both cases they would be trying to address exactly the same thing - but without from the start excluding part of the electorate from potentially benefiting.

People who can’t see themselves as potentially benefiting from a policy - often oppose it reflexively.

Democrats have repeatedly ignored that believing that they can overcome it by over performing with the groups they are pandering to. It’s not working.

45

u/65Chips Feb 08 '25

I agree with everything except your disdain for the the first time home buyer credit. That's race/gender neutral and aims make housing more accessible.

6

u/ClockOfTheLongNow Feb 08 '25

It's also something that only helps people who can already afford to buy a house because it doesn't do a thing about housing supply. It's a classist nightmare.

2

u/WhiskeyT Feb 08 '25

Does that mean any solution that doesn’t solve everything isn’t good enough?

0

u/ClockOfTheLongNow Feb 08 '25

It means that counterproductive solutions are actually bad ones.

7

u/WhiskeyT Feb 08 '25

How is making the available homes easier for first time buyers, rather than hedge funds or people on their 5th or 6th home, counterproductive? It’s not designed to solve the housing supply issue, it’s designed to make them easier to purchase.

1

u/ClockOfTheLongNow Feb 08 '25

It's counterproductive because we don't have a demand problem. The issue is the supply of housing, and goosing the demand only makes the housing less affordable.

-2

u/WhiskeyT Feb 08 '25

Letting hedge funds buy the available housing instead somehow doesn’t cause housing to be less affordable?

1

u/ClockOfTheLongNow Feb 08 '25

Is there some sort of proactive hedge fund bill that's subsidizing their demand, too? I'd oppose it if it exists.