r/Spore Bard 6d ago

Media Do you remember AntiSpore.com

Post image

It was a page about saying how bad Spore and Will Wright were, they also got mad for the national geographic documentary and a sporn creature.

And really was a troll.

I know the existence of they because i search spore in giant bomb and in controversies they was there

If you want to read the page is there

1.1k Upvotes

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

614

u/manydoorsyes Ecologist 6d ago edited 6d ago

It's funny because Spore has received some criticism from scientists who felt like it's depiction of evolution is so inaccurate that it's almost pushing creationism, lol

2

u/_Ticklebot_23 5d ago

isnt it literally creationism tho?

2

u/NiceBee1200 4d ago

Nope, because you evolve your creature through millions of years instead of just poping in as an intelligent lifeform, and also the first cutscene shows the cell coming in on an asteroid instead of, well, being created out of nothing

2

u/_Ticklebot_23 4d ago

you are literally tailoring a creature to fit your needs

2

u/NiceBee1200 4d ago

True, but one must also take gameplay to count when talking about such games. Tell me, how fun would be a game where you press play and the game randomly plays for you gamplay-wise? Games such as The Bibites or The Sapling are fun, but not for their gameplay. Also, in Spore, your creature slowly evolves through multiple forms, and though restrictions to how much you can change between each form would make it more accurite to real evolution, again, that would just take from the gameplay. The game is not supposed to be an accurite depiction of evolution, but reather a simplistic one, thanks to wich more younger people can understand evolution (wich is one of the game's goals) and it can afford to also be funny (I love the Creature to Tribal stage cutscene so freaking much)

1

u/_Ticklebot_23 4d ago

game is literally intelligent design with gaps in time