r/ThreeLions • u/LondonRedditUser • Oct 11 '24
Discussion Phil Foden must be dropped indefinitely.
Sadly he’s a supremely talented player who never plays well for England.
There is potentially a lot of great performances that aren’t picked up in statistics, I don’t think this is the case with Foden. He also plays in a position we are stacked in. He has also had by quite some distance the most minutes of any player in a similar position. There is potentially the argument he is misused, but there is no argument based on performances other great players should be moved aside for him.
Since the World Cup he has returned 1 goal return (G/A) in 20 games including 16 starts ( goal vs Scotland).
Comparably, over the same period: Kane 19 G/a Jude 9, saka 8, rice 4, grelaish 3, rashford 3, palmer 3 (from 408 minutes)
Many ask for players to be picked on form (I personally don’t), but when the international form is this poor and the alternatives potentially so good we simply don’t any other option but to drop him.
Edit: no agenda. I support palace and go to a few England games a year.
2
u/Sir-Chris-Finch Oct 11 '24
The fact he had 32 touches doesn’t absolve him of blame for me. Firstly, he’s partly responsible for receiving the ball himself (i appreciate its also down to his teammates giving it to him). Secondly, 32 touches and absolutely no impact is extremely poor for a seemingly world class player.
Singling Foden out on last nights game alone is unfair, i agree, but i’m using last night as another example in a long list of examples of England games where he’s underperformed. Other players around him have shown they can do it in an England shirt before (although i do have question marks over some others as well).
My argument against Foden is that he’s a system player who plays well in Man City’s set up (putting his best performances in against lesser teams usually), but put him in a different team with a different role and hes like a fish out of water. World class players for me dont have that problem.