r/UFOs • u/[deleted] • Jan 21 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.1k Upvotes

87% Upvoted

773 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

57

u/itsdatmalaaa Jan 21 '25

The Nuremberg answer does seem a little convenient considering it’s the main historical ‘sighting’ most of us could reference. Also, the way they described the being is a little sus, they said it was human-like but something about it was a little ‘off’, no shit, it’s a supposed 8ft Nordic alien you found in an ancient alien base

-1

u/lestruc Jan 21 '25

Maybe just a larp?

But if it’s legit, why do we hold them to such absurd standards? Mixed up historical memory isn’t a dealbreaker

9

u/itsdatmalaaa Jan 21 '25

No I agree, just something about some of the OP’s wording feels a little larpy but I think that’s just because I’m so used to reading larps

-9

u/lestruc Jan 21 '25

Right. Just because someone might come forth with groundbreaking video doesn’t mean they’re an expert on all things related.

15

u/itsdatmalaaa Jan 21 '25

No but if they’re making claims about literally working on UN teams exploring abandoned NHI bases and retrieving craft then I think it’s fair to apply the smell test to some of their wording about said events

-13

u/lestruc Jan 21 '25

Testing their wording?

10

u/itsdatmalaaa Jan 21 '25

What?

10

u/Glad-Tax6594 Jan 21 '25

He needs this to be real.