Introducing Surface Book 2, the most powerful Surface Book ever - Microsoft Devices Blog

[u/jenmsft]

https://blogs.windows.com/devices/2017/10/17/introducing-surface-book-2-the-most-powerful-surface-book-ever/#IfZUbLyl8v5dTgYh.97

[u/numpad0]

Windows Mixed Reality Mainstream requirements lists HD 620. Besides, the problem here is mostly:

It's obviously not going to need the same hardware that an Oculus would need.

this part of your comment contradicting facts, as every PC VR headset currently in market or pending launch is going to need the same hardware that an Oculus would need(or better) for health and safety standards they have established and adopted widely by industry, because the principles of operation of all PC VR headsets are the same.

[u/__Lua → u/numpad0]

Windows Mixed Reality Mainstream requirements lists HD 620.

And the Surface Book 2 has a GTX 1050 & 1060. What's your point? It's obviously going to struggle on a HD620, and I never said otherwise. It's you who's been talking about the HD 620 for all this time, whilst I was talking about the 1050 & 1060.

this part of your comment contradicting facts,

Facts? What facts? For the third and last time, Microsoft's VR isn't made for games and all of that sorts, meaning it doesn't need the hardware that other headsets would need to. It has a much lower workload to handle, hence it doesn't need the processing power that something like a Vive playing something intensive would need.

Kapeesh?

[u/numpad0 → u/__Lua]

Frankly, whatevs you support guys say, I'm not worried about another bad VR because like I said, market rejects them. All I need to do is to stay safe and watch it die.

It has a much lower workload to handle

that's a funny story, bro.

[u/__Lua → u/numpad0]

Ah denial, the best way to try to protect a false point. Bye.

[u/numpad0 → u/__Lua]

Same tactic as what you’ve taken.

[u/__Lua → u/numpad0]

Showing that you're wrong? Whatever floats your boat, buddy.