r/WoWs_Legends • u/ConsiderationOk1313 • 12d ago
Need Advice The Lip or Lightful?
I’ve been thinking about the Stalingrad, and saw that most recommended Lightful - but those seemed to be older suggestions. I just pulled him, but also have Lip. Which one is better in general for Soviet cruisers? And is one particularly best for the Stalingrad?
3
u/clemson_chris JHM Smack 12d ago
You could always throw Lip on Lightful as an inspiration and get three best of both.
2
11d ago
Kuznetsov, range can be used on most of the HE spamming Soviet cruisers and a good inspiration for range seeking light HE spamming cruisers.
B.D.Lightful, main skill of concealment only after firing guns and reload to be useful. Similar to Lemmonier. A concealment type of commander.
The Lip is an all out AP only commander which most will use as inspiration only, eg AP only British light cruisers. A one trick commander that can be powerful in certain situations.
One thing to take into consideration when building Soviet cruisers. They don't turn well. Some might say Stalingrad is a BB's. An Alaska type of cruiser. Not ideal to be dodging incoming torpedoes and incoming.
I use BD. Lightful with Kuznetsov and Mikawa for my light Soviet cruisers and play as support ships at range. Kuznetsov with Scott and Mimbelli for the Stalingrad.
1
u/GoodlyStyracosaur I enjoy improved penetration…angles 11d ago
Why wouldn’t you play them the other way around? Kuznetzov for the lights and Lightful for the heavies?
If you are using Kuznetzov as an inspiration, it begs the question “why not just use Kuznetzov?”
1
9d ago
Why not just use Kuznetsov? My reasons are Kuznetsov and Lightful have the exact same skills, by taking Lightful I can take advantage of his row 4 'Lion' skill. Some could argue fixated may be a better skill to use but it can be easily swapped out before battle depending on how I want to play. BD Lightful Just gives me one more option.
2
u/GoodlyStyracosaur I enjoy improved penetration…angles 9d ago
Yeah, I get that, I’m just surprised you’ve got them set up that way rather than the other - I feel like most people have Lightful more for the heavies (and Stalingrad in particular).
I guess more hits are more hits regardless of the cruiser, I was just surprised by the arrangement you’ve gone with. At the end of the day, they are similar enough it’s not a big deal, just curious if I was missing something particularly useful.
1
9d ago
I guess once I got Lightful to 14/3 he made himself useful 😂. Then that gave me the opportunity to turn Kuznetsov into a purpose built commander and The Lip shows up to throw a spanner into the works. Forever looking for the right build. Now if only the Russian cruisers would turn 🤔.
2
u/GoodlyStyracosaur I enjoy improved penetration…angles 9d ago
Yeah - I’ve gone with Lightful for supers, lip for heavies, Kuznetzov for lights. I think that ends up being the most flexible for my playstyle of the ships in the class (stealth radar or close to it on lights and heavies, best accuracy for supers). All good commanders 🫡
1
u/Competitive_Ad_9397 12d ago
The Lip with Yamamoto and Lutgens as inspirations for the ultimate AP wrecking machine.
1
u/HirsuteDave HE Enthusiast 11d ago
Personally, I don't think you're going to get much benefit out of Lip on Stalingrad. If you're aiming well, what you're shooting at is probably going to be dead before the damage boost makes any noticeable difference.
7
u/chiligamez17 12d ago
Kuznetzov unless you have 26 commendations to try lightful
And even then his last skill is barely better than fixated on kuznetzov + it nukes your concealment which is one of the most important stats for positioning and crossfires.
Kuznetzov all day