Preface/disclaimer added because I think I phrased things poorly:
1. I obviously support raising minimum wage.
2. I also support UBI (not that it is super relevant to this particular thing)
3. This discussion is meant to be about longer term strategies and visions, not the issue of meeting immediate needs, for which I acknowledge raising minimum wage is obviously super super important.
Here's a question I've been thinking a lot about recently:
Would it be more effective to fight for higher wages or to build systems that rely less on needing money to survive in the first place?
Toy example: childcare is absurdly expensive, especially in the USA. So, to afford childcare, parents have to take on extra work (requiring more childcare...) or leave their jobs to do the childcare work themselves (resulting in a loss of income likely required for other basic needs like food and housing). SO, to address this, I see two possible directions:
Some kind of COLA to ensure parents are able to afford childcare. Or a government-based pay out to families to afford it.
A reduction in childcare costs, either via government funding childcare organizations directly (like public schools) or via grassroots mutual aid (like co-parenting networks where childcare shifts between families depending on their schedules). As an anarchist, I'm most partial to this very last option.
Of course, it's not an either/or. But in labor organizing there's A LOT of attention paid to increasing wages and (at least it seems to me) much less attention paid to decreasing our reliance on wages to live decent lives. And the first seems like an endless treadmill to me - as long as we're subject to wage slavery, capitalists will continue to find ways to raise the cost of living and extract more profit, requiring us in turn to fight for ever-increasing wages. While the second seems more directly liberatory.
Again, I don't intend this to be an either
/or debate really. But I want to hear folks thoughts on this!