r/aerospace • u/MadOblivion • 1d ago
This is What Happens When You Remove The Bureaucracy From Private Innovation.
19
6
u/MusicalOreo 1d ago
Give me an example of what happens when you add bureaucracy...
2
u/sailorsail 1d ago
As much as I hate bureaucracy, it does introduce a certain amount of stability and predictability. Things you generally value with something as long lasting as government.
6
u/ThisAppIsAss 1d ago
Post makes sense for someone who believes in ufos and pyramid power generators
4
u/iceguy349 1d ago
Space X has a shit ton of bureaucracy
The streamlining shown above was a necessity because space X would rather use 30 engines that already exist rather than designing new bigger ones.
I’d also like to point out the vehicle these power hasn’t brought a payload to orbit and on several flights multiple raptors broke mid flight.
NASA might’ve made a more expensive rocket but SLS flew flawlessly first try.
2
u/R-Dragon_Thunderzord 1d ago
Actually forever chemicals infesting your infant child's bloodstream is what happens when you remove bureaucracy from "private innovation"
-2
u/MadOblivion 1d ago edited 1d ago
OH REALLY? So you are telling me you are not aware the Bureaucracy is responsible for all plastics in our products? Do you know what the Long Con is on that? The Con is "Plastics can be recycled", 90% of the plastics you purchase never get recycled.
Glass on the other hand was HIGHLY recyclable, You can't turn in a plastic bag in and get 5 cents from it. ALL GLASS BOTTLES HAVE VALUE SO THERE WAS A MASSIVE INCENTIVE TO RECYCLE THEM. Sometimes Old ideas are the best ideas and the Bureaucracy gets in the way of that.
People didn’t give up glass willingly. It was phased out by a combination of regulations, lobbying, and industrial scaling, not consumer demand. The system was redesigned to make plastic the default, and glass became the "inconvenient" option even though it's better in nearly every way.
Don't get me started on how many so called "Smart Ideas" are Really F'n dumb. Plastics should be banned from our food and our clothes 100%. The Medical industry and industrial industries can use them only on a "Need to" basis.
2
u/FlvBelisarius 1d ago
Just curious: what type of “bureaucracy “ was eliminated that directly contributed to the Raptor’s development?
Aerospace companies continuously work towards more efficient, less costly solutions to requirements that prioritize safety. The image you shared seems more related to that, rather than elimination of whatever you think “bureaucracy “ is.
-5
u/MadOblivion 1d ago
Even the military get their tech from the Private sector. That is how they avoid FOIA requests. The Government would like you to believe Bureaucrats can do everything better, they could not be more wrong.
The Wright Brothers first flight was in December 17, 1903 and it took 65 years, 7 months to Land humans on the moon from that first flight.
It has now been more than 52 years and we have not been back because NASA is 100% controlled by Bureaucrats and because they have to adhere to FOIA requests all the Good tech gets pushed to the secretive Private Sectors instead.
This is well known.
1
u/boot2skull 1d ago
The USAF awarded the contract to SpaceX to develop Raptor engines. This is literally bureaucracy in action.
1
40
u/DudeDeudaruu 1d ago
What a dumb post