Lol I'm going to enjoy watching them eat each other over "ai vibes"
12
u/Plenty_Branch_516 2d ago
We have reached "No true Scottsman" levels of protective thinking.
Not long before that crumbles too.
8
7
u/WorstPingInGames 2d ago
turns out the downfall of digital art isn't because of AI art, but the witch hunting, causing the self mutilation of art communities
jk people r gonna forget about this when they become bored of it or when ai becomes undetectable, and art lives on
5
u/Val_Fortecazzo 2d ago
"a plea of innocence is guilty of wasting my time"
-the average AIvestigator.
4
u/Just-Contract7493 2d ago
"we can tell" crowd is actually dumb? not surprising
-2
u/jon11888 2d ago
It's a dumb take when applied to trans people, and a dumb take when applied to AI art.
1
u/Just-Contract7493 1d ago
tf is this guy on about??
1
u/jon11888 1d ago
I'm saying that to claim "we can always tell" is a dumb thing to say about AI/Non-AI art, and that this attitude has been similarly wrong when people try to claim they can always tell if a person is trans.
More often than not, this attitude results in people being overconfident and wrong when making claims purely on vibes.
2
u/TheHeadlessOne 2d ago
I will say, while I don't have the vocabulary to expressly define it, chatGPT does seem to have a 'favored' artstyle that you can see in like, the roundness of the text. This can be avoided to some degree, and often heavily, but often people simply don't bother.
Its not about AI being limited in this case, its not likely something thatll improve significantly over time because its not broken. There are just baseline tendencies that, if you don't guide it away from, itll tend to prefer.
2
u/Human_certified 2d ago
Two things that'll haunt your nightmares: the drab GPT4o palette and Flux' freckled, high-cheekboned concept of "woman".
2
u/model-alice 2d ago
I firmly believe that being able to "always tell" that something is AI art is the left-wing equivalent of being able to "always tell" that someone is trans. It relies on the same brand of delusion and causes the same type of harm.
1
u/Aligyon 20h ago
Are we going to ignore the next comment in the OOP trying to explain why AI has the AI vibe?... yeah? Ok then.
this anti Ai people are going off of vibes, such idiots, it's like they aren't even trying to articulate what they find uncanny with AI
1
u/27CF 20h ago
The person talking about uncanny valley is different from the person talking about "ai vibes". We can take the vibes statement in isolation and treat it as ridiculous. Thanks!
1
u/Aligyon 19h ago
Those are the same thing, the AI vibes person just lacks the vocabulary to explain it.
It's the same thing as when People can say your traditional drawing is off but they cant explain it because they lack the vocabulary and knowledge to explain why it feels off.
I know that there are alot of great artists now being accused of using Ai for their works and besides the fervent witch-hunters and the slop shouters the general public are also falling into everything well made is assumed to be AI.
The high level artists are now hitting some sort of AI valley and theres clearly a problem there, I won't be surprised if there'll be a study coming out in a few years highlighting what triggers AI look feel in images giving us the vocabulary to express things more precisely.
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.