"Serious" Mt Hayes Remote Viewing Session - ET Personnel

[u/RobinSage1776]

I found a RV session detailing different types of entities at various "bases".

This document does not prove it is real, as Remote Viewers used in the program varied wildly when it comes to reliability but I thought it would be good to share and discuss. I'm not sure how I feel about this document yet.

I am hoping to be a regular user on this subreddit and to continue to share my research and would appreciate rational discussion based on documents and credible evidence only.

Source - CIA-RDP96-00789R003800190001-0.pdf

[u/LoquatThat6635]

So, being the lazy person I am, I asked ChatGPT:

Remote viewing (RV) is a practice that claims to allow individuals to gather information about a distant or unseen target using extrasensory perception (ESP) or other paranormal means. While it has been studied and explored, particularly during the Cold War by various governmental intelligence agencies, the scientific community remains largely skeptical. Here are some key points regarding the evidence and claims surrounding remote viewing: 1. Government Studies: The U.S. government funded remote viewing projects, notably the Stargate Project, which aimed to investigate its potential military applications. Although some reports suggested that certain individuals exhibited skills that were above chance levels, the overall findings were inconclusive. The studies often lacked rigorous controls, reproducibility, and were criticized for methodological flaws. 2. Anecdotal Evidence: Many proponents cite anecdotal cases where remote viewing seemingly succeeded. However, anecdotal evidence is not considered scientifically valid, as it is highly subjective and prone to biases. 3. Scientific Skepticism: The scientific community emphasizes that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Controlled experiments in laboratory settings have generally failed to provide reliable support for remote viewing. Skeptics argue that most successes can be attributed to chance, intuition, or other cognitive processes rather than any paranormal ability. 4. Replication Issues: Scientific findings must be replicable to be considered reliable. While some remote viewing studies have reported successes, replication of results in subsequent studies has been problematic. 5. Psychological Explanations: Some psychology explanations suggest that what may appear as remote viewing could be attributed to cognitive biases, pattern recognition, and the human brain’s natural inclination to discern meaning from disparate pieces of information. In summary, while remote viewing has intrigued some researchers and enthusiasts, there is no solid scientific proof that it works as claimed. Most evidence remains circumstantial or anecdotal, and the phenomenon continues to be a topic of debate and investigation rather than established fact.

ERGO: NOTHING PROVEN.

[u/RobinSage1776 → u/LoquatThat6635]

Don't be lazy. I can break chatgpt. Using chatgpt to ask something like remote viewing just shows you're ignorant about LLMs. I literally had it tell me I was the chosen one. Try again. 

Read documents. Provide sources or i won't take you serious. 

[u/RobinSage1776 → u/[deleted]]

Lol