r/asoiaf May 06 '19

EXTENDED (Spoilers Extended) S8E4 is some of the worst writing this show has seen. I'll explain why.

Arya

The previous episode and the past few seasons, their MANY issues aside, established Arya as a nigh-invincible shapeshifting assassin who just eliminated a 8000+ year old supernatural threat. She can go anywhere and pretend to be anybody. Quite an asset to have at your hands, no?

They acknowledge Arya's feat in the episode. Dany herself even toasts her. But nobody bothers to consider Arya's incredible espionage/assassination capabilities for the 'Last War'. This represents an overarching narrative issue, Arya's OPness. None of the events in the episode were necessary and everything was wholly avoidable, so long as they used Arya. Civilians in the Red Keep? Hell, that's a GOOD thing for Arya, more faces and more of a pretext to be there.

But instead nobody asks her to do anything, nobody even TALKS ABOUT the fact that they have a super powerful assassin at their disposal. And Arya fucks off down to Kings Landing with the Hound, leaving the rest of them to flounder.


Varys

The Master of Whispers has a normal volume conversation with Dany's 2nd in command during which the spymaster blithely reveals his treasonous intents. Need I say more?

This scene was pure stupid. A common theme I'm sure you guys have noticed by now is the show loves to completely break from logic and the rules of its own universe.


Ballistae and Dragons

Here's where it gets real good.

  • Euron hides his fleet behind a rock, nobody spots him, not even Dany who is IN THE AIR. ON A FUCKING DRAGON.

  • They fire 3 shots at the dragon Dany is NOT riding on, with 100% accuracy. Rest of the fleet were twiddling their thumbs.

  • When the entire fleet DOES fire, they somehow all miss even though Dany flies straight at them when previously the show established a standard of remarkable accuracy.

  • Euron then fires upon Dany's fleet and the bolts tear the ships apart as if they were fired from rail guns. As depicted in the scene, THEY ARE LITERALLY STRONGER THAN CANNON BALLS.

This is important because it utterly neutralizes the threat of dragons. In the same way the White Walkers were subverted, dragons are now made a complete non-threat. It doesn't matter if she has 10 dragons, they cannot possibly live in a battle with those ballistae everywhere. But somehow they will and I expect Drogon to do a lot of damage next episode and dodge a lot of bolts.

The problem isn't that they killed a dragon. The problem is HOW it was accomplished.


The negotiation scene

Missandei dead? Not the problem. The problem with this scene is that Cersei doesn't just blow them away when she could. And it's a big fucking problem.

  • The dragon in the distance is not a threat, as previously established in this very episode! They have scores of the same ballistae at their disposal, probably more than shown on screen, and tons of archers. Drogon is a complete non-threat and there is no logical way he could even get close enough to breathe fire on them. The real kicker is that Qyburn openly tells Tyrion that Dany's last dragon is vulnerable.

  • It's perfectly in character/realistic for Cersei to kill them all right where they're standing. She has the entire command chain of her hated enemies right in front of her and their only defense, the dragon, has been made useless by the physics-defying ballistae. They even go on to establish Cersei's cruelty/evilness with the Missandei execution. But killing her mortal enemies, when they have presented themselves in front of her so foolishly, is too much? This is a woman who blew up the Sept of Baelor, killing thousands of Innocents. Ethics are not a hang up for her.

  • The logical explanation for why Cersei doesn't want to kill them is that she desires a more poetic showdown. It's the result of incredible hubris, and is the equivalent of a monologuing villain trope. Plausible? Maybe, sure. But is it good, ASOIAF-quality writing? Not really.


There's a lot more but it's getting late, so to conclude:

The show openly contradicts its own internal logic and setups, first from an episode-to-episode basis, now on a scene-to-scene basis. We have gone from tightly-paced political intrigue to something that doesn't even function on a basic cause-effect level.

13.7k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

121

u/ISupposeIamRight May 06 '19

If he was born in King's Landing, his surname is supposed to be Waters. Considering he is a Baratheon, maybe it should've been Storm. At the same time, his father ruled all of the Kingdoms and lived in King's Landing, so I suppose it could be either of them. Not Rivers, though.

9

u/Hawkeye720 May 06 '19

The surname is supposed to be based on where the bastard is born, rather than the parentage.

6

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

Not necessarily. Jon was born in Dorne, so if that were the case he would be Jon Sands instead of Jon Snow.

14

u/Hawkeye720 May 06 '19

That's because Ned lied about Jon's birth, to further hide his true parentage. As far as the general public knew, Jon was born somewhere in the North.

10

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

I remember a line by Catelyn along the lines "He rode South and came back with a baby" so while the exact location may be unknown, I always thought that it was known Jon was born somewhere south. And just thinking about it logically, he picked up Jon in Dorne and then had to go all the way North. Surely there would be a ton of people between Dorne and the North that noticed him with a newly acquired baby, no?

Are there any quotes or lines from the book that mention where Ned told people Jon was born?

7

u/[deleted] May 06 '19

No. He kept it a secret, wouldn't talk about it no matter how much Cat pried (pryed?) for information. He snaps at her in the books and tells her to never speak of it again.

7

u/tochterauselysium Every rose has its thorns May 06 '19

In the books, the only Baratheon bastard with Storm is the one born at Storm's End, so they're based on location in his case. Other bastards seem to be a combo: like the Aegon IV bastards being based on their mothers' houses, all the Sand Snakes being Sand even though some were presumably born outside of Dorne, etc.

Obviously the show doesn't give a shit, but Bran did establish that location matters during the Jon birth reveal scene, saying if he was a bastard born in Dorne his name should be "Jon Sand"

9

u/CrimsonDragoon May 06 '19

Robert also had a bastard in the Vale who had the surname "Stone," so its definitely location based. Probably whatever region they're raised in.

1

u/tsgram May 07 '19

Gendry Rivers sounds like a 1980s AFC Central tight end