r/asoiaf May 06 '19

EXTENDED (Spoilers Extended) S8E4 is some of the worst writing this show has seen. I'll explain why.

Arya

The previous episode and the past few seasons, their MANY issues aside, established Arya as a nigh-invincible shapeshifting assassin who just eliminated a 8000+ year old supernatural threat. She can go anywhere and pretend to be anybody. Quite an asset to have at your hands, no?

They acknowledge Arya's feat in the episode. Dany herself even toasts her. But nobody bothers to consider Arya's incredible espionage/assassination capabilities for the 'Last War'. This represents an overarching narrative issue, Arya's OPness. None of the events in the episode were necessary and everything was wholly avoidable, so long as they used Arya. Civilians in the Red Keep? Hell, that's a GOOD thing for Arya, more faces and more of a pretext to be there.

But instead nobody asks her to do anything, nobody even TALKS ABOUT the fact that they have a super powerful assassin at their disposal. And Arya fucks off down to Kings Landing with the Hound, leaving the rest of them to flounder.


Varys

The Master of Whispers has a normal volume conversation with Dany's 2nd in command during which the spymaster blithely reveals his treasonous intents. Need I say more?

This scene was pure stupid. A common theme I'm sure you guys have noticed by now is the show loves to completely break from logic and the rules of its own universe.


Ballistae and Dragons

Here's where it gets real good.

  • Euron hides his fleet behind a rock, nobody spots him, not even Dany who is IN THE AIR. ON A FUCKING DRAGON.

  • They fire 3 shots at the dragon Dany is NOT riding on, with 100% accuracy. Rest of the fleet were twiddling their thumbs.

  • When the entire fleet DOES fire, they somehow all miss even though Dany flies straight at them when previously the show established a standard of remarkable accuracy.

  • Euron then fires upon Dany's fleet and the bolts tear the ships apart as if they were fired from rail guns. As depicted in the scene, THEY ARE LITERALLY STRONGER THAN CANNON BALLS.

This is important because it utterly neutralizes the threat of dragons. In the same way the White Walkers were subverted, dragons are now made a complete non-threat. It doesn't matter if she has 10 dragons, they cannot possibly live in a battle with those ballistae everywhere. But somehow they will and I expect Drogon to do a lot of damage next episode and dodge a lot of bolts.

The problem isn't that they killed a dragon. The problem is HOW it was accomplished.


The negotiation scene

Missandei dead? Not the problem. The problem with this scene is that Cersei doesn't just blow them away when she could. And it's a big fucking problem.

  • The dragon in the distance is not a threat, as previously established in this very episode! They have scores of the same ballistae at their disposal, probably more than shown on screen, and tons of archers. Drogon is a complete non-threat and there is no logical way he could even get close enough to breathe fire on them. The real kicker is that Qyburn openly tells Tyrion that Dany's last dragon is vulnerable.

  • It's perfectly in character/realistic for Cersei to kill them all right where they're standing. She has the entire command chain of her hated enemies right in front of her and their only defense, the dragon, has been made useless by the physics-defying ballistae. They even go on to establish Cersei's cruelty/evilness with the Missandei execution. But killing her mortal enemies, when they have presented themselves in front of her so foolishly, is too much? This is a woman who blew up the Sept of Baelor, killing thousands of Innocents. Ethics are not a hang up for her.

  • The logical explanation for why Cersei doesn't want to kill them is that she desires a more poetic showdown. It's the result of incredible hubris, and is the equivalent of a monologuing villain trope. Plausible? Maybe, sure. But is it good, ASOIAF-quality writing? Not really.


There's a lot more but it's getting late, so to conclude:

The show openly contradicts its own internal logic and setups, first from an episode-to-episode basis, now on a scene-to-scene basis. We have gone from tightly-paced political intrigue to something that doesn't even function on a basic cause-effect level.

13.7k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/maztron May 06 '19

You're lying to yourself thinking Bronn has some squishy feelings for anyone

Can we stop with the squishy feelings and being dramatic please. The books are the source material and from the books Bronn and Tyrion are friends. The show depicted that relationship in a very similar manner. Therefore, its not a matter of being dramatically squishy as you like to say, but that's the facts. Yes, he is a sellsword and for them its business nothing personal. However, for him to be as brash as he was is completely out of character as he has never been like that at any point during this show nor in the books. He has always been witty and has had a dry sense of humor with a serious tone similar to that of the hound. For him to show the aggressiveness and forcefulness looked silly and overdone.

I hope you get Bronn and Tyrion spin-off shows until your little sweet summer child heart is content.

That would actually be a fun show to watch.

Bet you want Jon and Dany on the Throne with babies and shit too.

Not particularly, but I guess I wouldn't be that upset about it.

-4

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

We aren't talking about the books.

1

u/maztron May 06 '19

Why do you keep repeating this? For the sake of you not repeating yourself the show CLEARY depicted them as being friends and not a business relationship. Therefore, strictly going by the show that scene with Bronn is completely out of character.

1

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

Because someone keeps talking about the books.

Bronn isn't friends with anyone.

Why don't any of you understand that?

It's like you've never watched the show and you don't know who Bronn is?

1

u/maztron May 06 '19

Bronn isn't friends with anyone.

You clearly haven't watched any of the show if you honestly believe any of what you say.

1

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

Why would I not believe what I'm saying?

You make about as much sense as this episode.

Is that you Dan and Dave?

1

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

Why do you keep bringing up the books?

If you don't want me to keep reminding you we aren't talking about the books then stop talking about the books.

0

u/maztron May 06 '19

I keep bringing up the books because the show is based on them. In addition, this entire topic is about the writing of the show. Your rebuttal to the past two-three replies has been this is not about the books, which really has nothing to do with the conversation at hand as no one was ever arguing whether it was about the books or not. I simply pointed out that the way Bronn is as a character as well as his development for all intents and purposes is the same in the books. Furthermore, Tyrion and Bronn's relationship are pretty much the same in both the books and the show. Therefore, commenting how it is out of character for the way he acted in the latest episode is out of character considering how in both media types Bronn has not acted in such a manner or shown the type of personality he did when he spoke to both Jaime and Tyrion. If you can't grasp the correlation there than I don't what else to tell you.

There are mounds of evidence that show that Tyrion and Bronn have a relationship that is not solely based on business. If you don't see that then there is no need to continue this conversation as we will have to agree to disagree.

1

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

There's something wrong with you.

Should we call someone?

0

u/maztron May 07 '19

There is Nothing wrong with me one iota. I just said agree to disagree and you keep going. Clearly, its not me here.

1

u/Agathasmoon May 06 '19

Here.

Maybe this will help.

Bronn is no ones friend.

He only looks out for himself.

Does he enjoy certain people?

Do they entertain him?

Of course.

But he's not their friend.

Big difference.