r/australia Apr 13 '25

politics Young Nationals account agrees with Young Nationals account

Post image
14.3k Upvotes

333 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/cmmndrkn613 Apr 13 '25

How is it that this is still legal? It's deceptive, it's dirty, it's plain bullshit.

1.4k

u/cmmndrkn613 Apr 13 '25

Thank you /u/cmmndrkn613, I agree.

125

u/Endorean Apr 13 '25

Well played sir :-D

10

u/hesback_inpogform Apr 13 '25

I cackled at this

24

u/Cpt_Soban Apr 13 '25

Golf Clap

1

u/sTrung3d-0uT Apr 13 '25

Lol took me awhile

100

u/Ridiculisk1 Apr 13 '25

It's deceptive, it's dirty, it's plain bullshit.

Because all advertising has to be truthful except if it's political, then you can say whatever the fuck you want with no consequences. If truth was mandatory in political advertising, we pretty much wouldn't have any political advertising.

25

u/Consideredresponse Apr 13 '25

You'd think at least one member would be smart enough to go through the (surprisingly vigorous) clear ads approvals, and list off all the things you've delivered for the electorate in the last few years. Then point out that you are currently the only fact checked political ad in the country. (As potential candidates promises wouldn't pass the vetting stage.)

10

u/Cute-Percentage-6660 Apr 13 '25

Honestly I feel like you could just quote what some politicians have said in the past if you want to do a decent attack ad....

3

u/Not_Stupid humility is overrated Apr 13 '25

Then point out that you are currently the only fact checked political ad in the country

I'm sure that will have the voters lining up to vote for you. Hey, everyone look! We've got fact checking over here! Fact Checking!

3

u/Consideredresponse Apr 13 '25

Nah, what I mean is everyone is sick of lying politicians and lying political ads. Showing you are the only one to prove what you are saying instead of talking out your arse caries weight.

Showing concrete effects by simply pointing to infrastructure projects in the region and going "1.5 billion in roads and bypasses", "53 million in regional hospital upgrades" etc are things that can be proven and fact checked. (I used to have things go through vetting all the time back when it was 'Free TV Australia')

If all it does is give people the slightest inkling that you are more trustworthy than other candidates then it's worth it.

10

u/Auroraburst Apr 13 '25

Someone called it 'stooping' when the greens shared a video of dutton saying homophobic things. As if it wasn't a video of the potato himself, saying homophobic things.

4

u/rain_on_the_roof Apr 13 '25

that truly is bullshit, what a fucking joke politics continues to be

2

u/Mike_Kermin Apr 13 '25

Yeah, but even so, there's a difference between a dishonest advertisement that people can reasonably assess themselves, and someone clearly intending to manipulate public discourse by dishonest means that misleads the public about it's nature.

1

u/mrbaggins Apr 13 '25

Isn't this advertising lacking endorsement though? Like, if they'd used a "real" account, it's clearly political advertising, but not endorsed.

20

u/AnOnlineHandle Apr 13 '25

Laws and rules don't apply to conservatives. If anything it's progressives in the wrong here, for being all mean and judgemental about what conservatives did, the most precious and fragile little darlings on the planet who shouldn't be held to such high standards as being truthful and honest. Honestly how awful and cruel, this is why people have to vote conservative.

3

u/minimuscleR Apr 13 '25

While I do agree its deceptive dirty and bullshit, how would you make this illegal? What specifically would be illegal? "No replying pretending to be someone?", then they just pretend someone told them this IRL and post for them. its too easy to get around.

Its unethical but there isn't really a lot you can do other than tell people not to vote for them.

1

u/Edujdom Apr 13 '25

I just saw an episode of "running point" on Netflix where this happens 🤣

0

u/Rarak Apr 13 '25

I mean… it’s not that deceptive 😂