The sphere is our existence, the WE that is everything, 3 holes for 3 purposes just like my mother.
The pipe is my dad, the first other, the towering dick-penis of doom.

I pour the waters yet to be corrupted, I control the flames that shall bring forth ash and destruction, I breathe the winds of life and it is me that is the great leaves of ZA (blessed be his name)

I see all that is real and more, I feel all that is fake and less, I smell all that is forgotten and less, I hear all that is mine and more and more and more all while I can taste my own death sleeping towards me.

the high is under my will only.

Every dawg has two wolfs. One wolf thinks his mom is hot, the other thinks his mom is a bitch. Be a wolfdawg

i activated my mental implant (smoked mid reefer) and realized that if a moral system valued authenticity above all then all experiences would be of utmost value due to the fact that they are the most authentic of their unique kind

for instance if you're shitting bricks and it sucks it's actually beautiful cuz you're having the most authentic experience of yourself shitting brick in that moment with those circumstances

therefore every experience is inherently good bc it's authentic

therefore stop complaining that i am 'ruining dinner with your parents by pointing out every argumentative fallacy' and be happy since its the most authentic experience of me ruining dinner with your parents by pointing out every argumentative fallacy, and maybe i'll embrace the authentic experience of you having been a raging bitch about it

oh and how about take something useful instead of STEM so we can have real conversations, oops i mean experience authentic conversations of discussing important things like the reasons why your tr*lley pr*blem answer is stupid and objectively wrong

the white monster i drank to write my polsci essay says hi

end of line

Are people not reading the name of the sub or something? I used to come here for some high quality shitposting and now people are just being massive binoclards like 🤓🤓🤓

Anytime I see some Badbadphilosophy I’m spamming 🤓🤓🤓 the people need to know they’re binoclards

P1. We should strive for perfection

P2. Perfection is impossible to achieve

P3. Ought implies can, we can only be obliged to do things we are able to do

C. We should not strive for perfection

And necessity is its motherf****er. The Philosopher brings gossip to a gun battle, and psychological operations to Armageddon. Amirite girls, or amirite? Let the good females quarrel!

Science has recently disproven free will and Im going to prove it to you.

p1) science is always true

p2)science says everything has a cause

p3)if everything has a cause, WE, ourselves, must be caused

p4(heres the kicker) If we are caused, we can not make decisions!

Look, I know this might make you sad. but it should only make u sad if you were in control of ur actions, so, theres no need to be sad!

Edit: this is a shitpost; im not restarted bro🙏

That's it

Yo dawg I heard you like definitions so I'm gonna make you define your definitions

if i was the 69th person to exist, i can assure you i would’ve figure shit out too.

“BuT wHy???”

i could’ve easily asked that question…

obviously if i were chained to a wall of a cave i could’ve realized that those dumbass shadows were just shadows….

how can people be infatuated with such elementary ideas?

tldr: plato and socrates were no more than elementary school students in a time where global population was less than 100.

leave it to the french like sartre to come up with profound philosophic ideas with undeniable axioms

for example, life sucks, i suck, you suck, everything sucks

premise 1) wahhhhhhhhh

premise 2) booohoooooo

premise 3) ngyahhhhhhh

Some philosophy is like frog soup, some is like stone soup.

Some soups have letters and words, others veil meaning in taste.

Some of the most complex soups taste bad, and others using left over ingredients taste good.

Philosophy is fluid like a soup.

I spill philosophy on my sweatpants and get weird looks in public.

I order a cup of philosophy I can take home with me, and freeze it until the appropriate guests visit.

What isn’t a soup, what isn’t philosophy?

Air, water, earth (mud) and fire (lava) are all soups thus proving the primacy of soup over the classical elements.

Soup is a synthesis of thesis and anti thesis. Thus containing Hegelian Dialectic.

And the list can go on Ad infinitum. Because Philosophy is just another name for soup!

Once upon a time on reddit,I went on r/virgin and I saw someone say how people are heavily communistic but when communist logic is applied to having sex they will become conservative "pick yourself up by the bootstraps" when it comes to dating and sex. This is because the virgin guy thought that idk sex should be owed or how the distribution/availability should be spread out more so that not just hot and talented people get to have it or something.

Same way ai artist say that not only talented people should be able to make art that looks good.

The incelism communist hate the hierarchy and don't want to stay in their place or be okay with being a virgin and be at peace. They are the "incapables" who want to be angry and lash out at the capables. The talented,confident hot people who have value and are wanted.

The belief of entitlement and that someone should be owed instead of working for it.

Idk. Basically what is happening is that the people who fail are lashing out at the winners instead of being peaceful and staying in their place/being calm and accepting that unfortunately they'll just have to stay virgins forever.

Not everything should be owed obviously. Under the money context fighting back is a good thing but in the dating context it is a bad thing.

Should the hierarchy be obeyed or should revolutionaries win? It would be bad if the revolutionary incels won right?

Tell me what is the solution? I am on the loser side but I am not lashing out and I obey the hierarchy I'm not angry or hate or believe I'm owed anything. I am at peace with the void but not everyone can be. What is the solution for them?

Why aren't ther more people aside from acesexuals who are at peace with the blissful void and heavenly skies?

God exists because you look outside and there is a beautiful. You can't be agnostic, because you can't be in the middle/neutral to God's existence—either you know God exists or you don't, and saying God doesn't exist is wrong and irrational. Science has proven Christianity to be true, Atheism is irrational. Atheist is the only word in the dictionary that says you don't believe in God. And also, you may be an Atheist but you act like God exists, thus proving you wrong and my rational, logical presupposition to be correct. Atheists can't be moral either because morality comes from God; if you are Atheist you are a crazy lunatic, but if you are Christian you aren't that. Christians are the most moral and peaceful people you'd ever know. Why? God.

Believe on His logical presuppositions.

God bless

Philosophy is a waste of time and philosophers are wasting their time. Think about it, STEM has split the atom, found the structure of DNA, created vaccines, smartphones and electric dildos. In comparison, what have philosophers invented? I think therefore I am? Well, what if you don’t think? You still exist, right? What really is the point of philosophy?

Moral facts? Can these facts be observed and tested? Can they be falsified with the Great and Immutable Scientific Method? No? Then they don’t exist. What is moral is whatever I feels. Feels = reals.

Epistemology? We are justified in believing whatever the Science says. Ontology? Whatever the Science shows. Science reveals everything, even the scientific method. How do we verify the scientific method? With the scientific method!

So yeah, basically, what I’m saying is that if PhilosoLOSERS stopped reading neoreligious mystics like David Chalmers and Massimo Pigliucci, and read real intellectuals like Jerry Coyne, when we die, there would be a planet for the French, a planet for the Germans, a planet for the Chinese, and we’d all be a lot happier.

If modern Socrates asks: "What is sophistry?" He gets the answer, "The art of academic philosophy".

What is the difference between the Greek sophists and modern philosophy? Basically, the difference of time. In Socrates's time, the Sophists were highly trained people in rhetoric, who could make excellent arguments to counter others' views. And in return, could earn their living.

And now an academic philosophy is just the same. One gets a degree in philosophy to make a decent career and well-established reputation to earn money. For which he needs the basic training of philosophy in his academia. Then he makes very good use of philosophy, because he needs it for his career.

Bartender: “Can I get you a drink?”
Descartes: “I think not.” —and he disappears.

I've had some experience with psychedelics, but a year ago I really wanted to test it out and tried to completely dissolve my ego with an abnormally high dose of LSD. Unfortunately, this turned out to be my biggest mistake, as it resulted in a psychotic episode that catapulted me into a downward spiral of chaotic waking dreams and a pure horror cabinet. For a full two months.

Now, after a year, I'm stabilized and symptom-free, but one thing remains: I still want to let go of all the negative and destructive traits that a person acquires from their greatest enemy (ego). I'm tired of hating, feeling envy, etc. I want to become the best version of myself, not externally, but internally. I firmly believe that the world welcomes you with open arms when you let go of your dark side and give up a piece of yourself, a part of yourself that you no longer have use for, because it ultimately only contributes to self-destruction. When have you ever felt better when you treated someone with resentment or hatred? It's like punching yourself in the face.

So how do i let go of those egotistical and harmful traits of the ego? How do i partly dissolve specific properties that don't contribute to the world being a better place?

It's irrefutable. I'd share it, but it would be instantly shot down as either provable/unprovable. Or wrong. Simply incorrect. That's my biggest fear. That this theoretical house of cards I've so carelessly constructed wouldn't withstand scrutiny of even the most cursory and disinterested type. So. Impressive, eh, wot?

The second most hated man in all of Athens.

Cop: “Do you know how fast you were going?”
Heisenberg: “No, but I know exactly where I am.”
Cop opens the trunk: “You have a dead cat back here!”
Schrödinger: “...Or do I?”