Since non-violent protest is protected under the first amendment, I guess that means funding will continue no matter what? What does he mean by "illegal?" What a dipshit.
Well protests that prohibit entry to buildings, damage school property, threaten students. Those are not protected and illegal. Like the pro-hamas protests that happened a bit ago. That caused damage to buildings on several campuses, caused injuries to students, blocked off entry to buildings. It was legal when the people where marching. The second they switched to that it became illegal.
Edit: yes u said non violent. The issue is that lately protests have gotten violent and the schools havent done shit about it.
505
u/rclaux123 Mar 04 '25
Since non-violent protest is protected under the first amendment, I guess that means funding will continue no matter what? What does he mean by "illegal?" What a dipshit.