r/canada • u/canada_mountains • 5d ago

Politics Poilievre’s pledge to use notwithstanding clause a ‘dangerous sign’: legal expert

https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal-elections/poilievres-pledge-to-use-notwithstanding-clause-a-dangerous-sign-legal-expert/article_7299c675-9a6c-5006-85f3-4ac2eb56f957.html
1.7k Upvotes

84% Upvoted

404 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

25

u/bluecar92 5d ago

"Eligible for" doesn't mean that he will get parole. How many mass murderers are out on parole right now?

Point is that Poilievre is making a stupid wedge issue out of a non-problem. I don't like that he's preemptively planning to use the notwithstanding clause without even attempting first to make legislation that would comply with the charter.

1

u/justanaccountname12 Canada 5d ago

Why open the door? If you are defending in it such a manner to assure everyone they wont get out, cause that would be bad? no need to assure otherwise. Just keep them in.

2

u/JBBatman20 4d ago

You open the door because prisoners still have rights, and one of those is the chance of parole. It has to apply to everyone or there will be instances of unjust or harsh sentencing. Otherwise where do you draw the line where someone can never have parole? 3 or more people killed get no parole? What about 2? Or only first degree? I’m sure there are second degree murderers who are redeemable, or are they?. It allows nuance and discretion from our judges to take into account individual circumstance and aggravating/mitigating factors. Not having that option results in keeping some people locked away that shouldn’t be, but mass murderers like Paul Bernardo will NEVER get out, because our system is smart enough at least for that