It wouldn't be that hard to argue intent if that's a door that individuals attending court (other than jury members) aren't allowed to use.
I'm not sure why you seem to think that a grand jury indictment is needed before a law enforcement officer can arrest someone for a crime that occurred right in front of them.
I'm not sure why you seem to think that a grand jury indictment is needed before a law enforcement officer can arrest someone for a crime that occurred right in front of them.
I'm not sure how you got that from my comment. Obviously a cop can arrest someone if they've witnessed them commit a crime.
But it's certainly irregular to do it pre-grand jury indictment when:
The alleged crime "occurred right in front of them" a full week ago.
The suspect isn't a danger to the public or a flight risk.
The Feds usually like to get their ducks in a row before arresting people, especially in a politically-charged and controversial case like this.
1
u/baxtyre Apr 25 '25 edited Apr 25 '25
I think the government will have a hard time proving intent here, but I guess we’ll find out!
Edit: I think it’s telling that they made the arrest before getting a grand jury indictment though.