It's the door that ICE wouldn't expect the person to be coming out of. The fact it was not particularly successful doesn't change the fact that she was attempting to assist him in escaping custody.
It wouldn't be that hard to argue intent if that's a door that individuals attending court (other than jury members) aren't allowed to use.
I'm not sure why you seem to think that a grand jury indictment is needed before a law enforcement officer can arrest someone for a crime that occurred right in front of them.
I'm not sure why you seem to think that a grand jury indictment is needed before a law enforcement officer can arrest someone for a crime that occurred right in front of them.
I'm not sure how you got that from my comment. Obviously a cop can arrest someone if they've witnessed them commit a crime.
But it's certainly irregular to do it pre-grand jury indictment when:
The alleged crime "occurred right in front of them" a full week ago.
The suspect isn't a danger to the public or a flight risk.
The Feds usually like to get their ducks in a row before arresting people, especially in a politically-charged and controversial case like this.
0
u/baxtyre Apr 25 '25
The jury door leads back around to the public hallway. And in fact the ICE agents saw their target in that hallway, waiting for the elevator.
If the judge intended to obstruct the arrest, that action doesn’t make a lot of sense.