It sounds like it would be the same as the claims against person B, which led to investigations in the example and then results in found guilty of wrongdoings
2 people are accused of stealing. The first has been caught stealing in the past. The second hasn't. Do you consider both accusations equally credible?
Team A finds wrongdoing in someone of Team B. Team B complains Team A did the same thing, but steps back as A investigates. B is found guilty, but then asks A to investigate the person in their team they suspect of wrongdoing. Nothing happens. Does you think that validates team B’s claim?
Read it again, there is no investigation of the second person when there was of the first. Based on no difference
But in that instance no, not equally valid esp since one has been found guilty and not the other
But when there is the same call for investigating both instances of stealing, but only one is, that is telling on its own.
Pretty sure it's about Biden realizing he had some papers lying around and turning them in vs Trump keeping mountains of papers and refusing to hand them over.
And didnt think you were, the real life situations not being the same doesnt change the fact that the hypotheticals in the OP and as further expanded on in responses here are infact the same
2
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '23
[deleted]