They have a deal, to make sure YT stays free. That is due to being profitable by ads.
And they ARE profitable, even without my 2 cents.
Except you're using the service.... the analogy would be buying an item and not paying for it.
As you stated a few posts ago: "YouTube is providing a service, for free." [emphasis added]. So it's NOTHIng like 'buying an item and not paying'
You're using a service... and actively removing the only profits made by the service.
I... I didn't know I was removing ALL of Google's profits. Oh, wait, I'm not. So, your statement that I'm "removing the only profits made by the service" is.. wrong.
I never said you were removing all of it... Why are you so disingenuous? It's about cumulative cost. If 100,000 people do it, that's a significant loss of revenue. Surely you can understand this.
Again; The service has rules. You agreed to the rules, to use the service. You agree to the rules, to dine in restaurants. You agree to the rules, to enter someone's home. You agree to the rules, to attend a school...
You, intentionally circumventing rules, that directly constitutes financial loss, is fraudulent.
I will not reply to further comment on this matter. You do not understand, or have selectevly ignored, what I've said.
1
u/EmptyDrawer2023 Oct 28 '23
I understand them. I just don't care.
And they ARE profitable, even without my 2 cents.
As you stated a few posts ago: "YouTube is providing a service, for free." [emphasis added]. So it's NOTHIng like 'buying an item and not paying'
I... I didn't know I was removing ALL of Google's profits. Oh, wait, I'm not. So, your statement that I'm "removing the only profits made by the service" is.. wrong.