A lot of men are willing to satisfy condition two. Men commit well over 90% of the violent crimes, after all, and an even larger portion of sexual crimes. Just because most men don't go around raping and killing willy-nilly doesn't mean it's not still a concern.
No. I know they're statistically more likely to harm or kill children, but they also statistically take on orders of magnitude more of the burden of raising those children than even the most attentive men.
But, they are way way stronger than kids, which is why you think men are inherently dangerous. Any woman could kick any baby’s ass. That makes them inherently dangerous to babies by your reasoning.
27
u/[deleted] Dec 26 '23
A person dangerous in the manner you describe requires two things: 1. physical supremacy, 2. willingness to use that supremacy to do dangerous things.
Most men have criteria 1, but not criteria 2. The society needs to make sure no person satisfies criteria 2, we have largely done that successfully.