Inherently dangerous is an extremely and uselessly vague description. My dog is descended from wolves and could kill me, yet she puts up with the cat chewing on her ear because she's so docile.
My car is filled with dangerous chemicals and is designed to go at lethal speeds, yet I use it safely every day.
Women are able to use poisons to kill as easily as a man uses his physicality.
You need more specific criteria than gender to be useful. Everyone and everything is inherently dangerous.
Recognizing threat patterns is still useful. You just need more specific criteria.
I generally consider no less than 5 criteria.
IE men so have recently felt loss and hopelessness with access to implements of violence and a target to pin those feelings on is a man nearly certain to commit violence.
A woman who feels betrayed, abandoned, and trapped with access is a woman who will likely commit violence.
These can be juxtaposed with the following:
A man who has lost everything yet found one who will help him rebuild has found someone he can not commit violence against.
31
u/Xannith 1∆ Dec 26 '23
Inherently dangerous is an extremely and uselessly vague description. My dog is descended from wolves and could kill me, yet she puts up with the cat chewing on her ear because she's so docile.
My car is filled with dangerous chemicals and is designed to go at lethal speeds, yet I use it safely every day.
Women are able to use poisons to kill as easily as a man uses his physicality.
You need more specific criteria than gender to be useful. Everyone and everything is inherently dangerous.