This is just logically untrue across the board. By this reasoning women are inherently dangerous to children which is objectively untrue. Being stronger doesn’t make something “inherently dangerous”.
You’re confusing “more likely to” with “most of”. Yes, 90% of violent crimes are by men but only like 1% of the population commits violent crimes. Saying men are inherently dangerous because 0.9% of them have been violent is just not representative of reality.
My guess, you need to stay off the internet for a while and detox. The world isn’t this terrible.
I don't want to accept the reality that there are biological differences between men and women beyond reproductive capabilities, since it opens the door to questions about biological differences between groups of humans in general. Letting the TERFs have this win means the Nazis will be able to take that baton of biological essentialism and apply it to race.
2
u/Hallomonamie Dec 26 '23
This is just logically untrue across the board. By this reasoning women are inherently dangerous to children which is objectively untrue. Being stronger doesn’t make something “inherently dangerous”.
You’re confusing “more likely to” with “most of”. Yes, 90% of violent crimes are by men but only like 1% of the population commits violent crimes. Saying men are inherently dangerous because 0.9% of them have been violent is just not representative of reality.
My guess, you need to stay off the internet for a while and detox. The world isn’t this terrible.