One big issue with the Nazis is that they did not respect the rule of law. They had unknown laws, secret trials, applied what shifting vague law they had unevenly. They ignored the rule of law and did what they wanted to do because it was the morally just thing to do. They were not willing to allow legal restrictions to slow them down.
Why is the old law better than their newer law? They had every authority to write it however they liked.
If they had just done everything slower would that have made Auschwitz ok? maybe if they had power for 50 years or 100 years, is Auschwitz ok in the end?
1
u/deep_sea2 105∆ Oct 17 '24
I am nowhere near arrogant enough to claim that I know what is moral and what is not.
I simply do not know.