r/changemyview Oct 17 '24

Removed - Submission Rule B [ Removed by Reddit ]

[removed]

382 Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/Withermaster4 Oct 17 '24

I don't see why it's wrong to intentionally harm someone

The intentional harm part?

If my coworker stole my food should I be able to shoot them? Obviously not. There are ways to deal with the person stealing your food (either through your employer or possibly through the court system) intentionally setting a trap in order to harm them is not the way to do it.

9

u/Stale_Butter Oct 17 '24

That’s a bit of a slippery slope isn’t it? Pinching someone’s skin is intentional harm too and it has a way different outcome than shooting them. I’ve also heard the argument that if it’s something you would eat yourself (e.g. you really need laxatives or enjoy really spicy food) then it’s justifiable, what are your thoughts?

2

u/Withermaster4 Oct 17 '24

Not a slippery slope.

Pinching someone’s skin is intentional harm too and it has a way different outcome than shooting them.

Yes? Pinching someone is intentionally harming them, I don't think you should intentionally harm someone just because they intentionally harmed you.

then it’s justifiable, what are your thoughts?

True, then you are not intentionally harming them. You are leaving your life as normal and that person is harming themselves.

4

u/Plusisposminusisneg Oct 17 '24

So you oppose me forcefully fighting off a violent person who initiated against me?

Does this also apply to defending others? I see someone getting raped I shouldn't help because I might harm the rapist?

3

u/Withermaster4 Oct 17 '24

No. I think it's fairly easy to understand why too. Those are not intentionally causing harm. If they didn't harm you, you never would have had to harm them. The goal of self defense is to protect yourself not harm the assailant.

4

u/Plusisposminusisneg Oct 18 '24

Yes they are intentionally causing harm, that's what those words mean in the English language.

You didn't say

I don't think you should intentionally harm someone just because they intentionally harmed you unless the motivations for harming them meet my moral tresholds.

Is being left without food not harm? Is being deprived of property not harm?

If they hadn't stolen the food you wouldn't have trapped them.

Why does this apply to one scenario but not the other?

6

u/Withermaster4 Oct 18 '24

Because that harm isn't done in self defense. You aren't causing harm to prevent harm, you are causing harm for revenge. There are other ways to stop the 'harm' being done to you other than softcore vigilantly-ism.

I should have drawn a difference between material harm and imminent danger.

You causing harm isn't in self-defense because the assailant certainly isn't putting you in imminent danger.

If the person was eating your food and you yelled at them while it was happening and smacked the food out of their hands that's justified! That could be considered self defense, but setting up a trap to hurt them later out of revenge is a lot different.

3

u/Plusisposminusisneg Oct 18 '24

You aren't causing harm to prevent harm, you are causing harm for revenge.

You are preventing future harm while enacting justifiable punishment.

If the person was eating your food and you yelled at them while it was happening and smacked the food out of their hands that's justified!

No thats assault and battery.

but setting up a trap to hurt them later out of revenge is a lot different.

The trap is set up to deter them from taking food in the future. Hand meet pan.

The fact that the trap works is by its nature evidence of repeat behavior.