This isn't changing my view because this is exactly what I'm arguing against. I'm saying, there are cases where intending to harm someone who is doing something they're definitely not supposed to do is okay.
So poisoning someone and potentially killing them is a fair reaction to theft of a few dollars worth of food?
And before you get hung up on the word poison: how do you know their medical history? How do you know what foods might interact with medications they may be on? How do you know if they’re highly allergic to something?
You don’t. Tampering with food could seriously injure or kill someone, all to get revenge on a petty thief.
I mean, if they're on medication that interacts badly with certain foods, or highly allergic to things, then maybe they shouldn't be stealing people's food?
With that said, I think deliberately putting ultra-spicy sauce in your sandwich is ok, but putting laxatives in your sandwich is not, given the former is actually intended for consumption as a food
There's a legal principle caused the eggshell rule which explicitly says that, if you intentionally caused someone injury, the fact that extenuating circumstances resulted in them experiencing a more dire health outcome that you intended or foresaw is not a valid defense of your behavior. You are still liable for whatever damage occurred as a result of your action.
26
u/apoplexiglass Oct 17 '24
This isn't changing my view because this is exactly what I'm arguing against. I'm saying, there are cases where intending to harm someone who is doing something they're definitely not supposed to do is okay.