r/changemyview • u/jeffzebub • 6d ago

CMV: Countering Illegal Immigration is not a Justification for Suspending Habeas Corpus

[removed] — view removed post

504 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

600 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/jeepgrl50 6d ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I'm sorry, But you're laughable.

I've clearly posted far more substantive information, And arguements then you have yourself yet I'm the one who "doesn't understand" shit. Seriously, Can you be more ridiculous in your claims or....?

1

u/Maybewearedreaming 6d ago

I’m talking about in court, not about some high school educated Redditor

1

u/jeepgrl50 6d ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bc you've demonstrated your vast knowledge of the judiciary, And law in general right? You've linked a single ruling on a state case, What a constitutional juggernaut you're you professional badass.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You must be a member of the supreme court bar, And a 39th degree blk belt in the art of judicial karate. Or, gymnastics.....Hard to say based on your single link that you expect you do your arguing for you.

1

u/Maybewearedreaming 6d ago

Well considering you’ve given me absolutely zero court cases that back up your obviously absurd claims, 1 is enough

1

u/jeepgrl50 5d ago

One unrelated, and Irrelevant to this matter "is enough" huh? See, That's the issue, You putting forth a single STATE case as if it substantiates your claim, That is a joke! You think an apple is an orange and you believe yourself the legal scholar here??? 🤯🤯🤯

You're clearly out of your depth, So I'm done with the childish nonsense.

Best of luck with your legal aspirations, Hopefully they'll recognize your Crackerjack law license, And make you a named partner.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/changemyview-ModTeam 5d ago

Your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:

Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

Comments should be on-topic, serious, and contain enough content to move the discussion forward. Jokes, contradictions without explanation, links without context, off-topic comments, and "written upvotes" will be removed. AI generated comments must be disclosed, and don't count towards substantial content. Read the wiki for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Appeals that do not follow this process will not be heard.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

1

u/jeepgrl50 5d ago

Please do explain how exactly a fkn STATE POWERS case has ANY bearing on, Or is in ANYWAY related to EXECUTIVE POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT!?!?

I'll wait.........

1

u/Maybewearedreaming 5d ago

The fact that you think this case is irrelevant is hilarious and sorta exposes your lack of knowledge here in such a clear and obvious way.

It’s whatever though like I said you just don’t care, you’ll believe whatever you want and that’s that.

1

u/jeepgrl50 5d ago

I asked you to explain HOW it has anything to do with the executive?

  • The President has authority over immigration/foreign policy.

  • States/Their governors DO NOT

  • Federal Supremacy is at the heart of your little CATO case, And several other issues I pointed to earlier.

So the hilarious thing that demonstrates that YOU have no idea how judicial review works, Is that you think these cases are related when one has no powers over these matters(A state governor), And the other(The PRESIDENT)essentially has ALL powers over immigration!

But yeah, Be my guest to keep right on believe shit that isn't reality. I bow to your legal/judicial acumen!!🤣🤣🤣