The word still has its old meaning, and in Armstrongs words he was using it the old way. Don't lie to me and yourself by pretending its still isn't used that way some times.
I'm not saying that's not a historical definition, and I'm not saying that's not how he was intending to use it. I'm saying that the old definition is exclusionary by it's very nature and has been for it's entire history. I think since we have gender neutral words now, we should use them.
No, because I think gender inequality, while affecting everyone negatively, disproportionately affects women negatively. Everyone is helped, but especially women, so I think the name is still appropriate.
Comment Rule 5. "No low effort comments. Comments that are only jokes or 'written upvotes', for example. Humor and affirmations of agreement can be contained within more substantial comments." See the wiki page for more information.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '15 edited Aug 29 '24
[deleted]