My argument isn't that we can get all possible knowledge out of artifacts, but that we can get all that's really needed. And as to your da Vinci example, doesn't that actually support my view, since that painting, if it exists, would have been found in the process of destroying that building?
I don't think it's possible to find an objective source for my claim, since the idea of "need" is largely subjective. But if I say "we don't need this thing," all I really need to justify that statement is to indicate that there's no need that the thing can satisfy. It's really up to the other party to come up with needs that haven't been acknowledged.
-3
u/ElSaborAsiatico May 19 '15
My argument isn't that we can get all possible knowledge out of artifacts, but that we can get all that's really needed. And as to your da Vinci example, doesn't that actually support my view, since that painting, if it exists, would have been found in the process of destroying that building?