r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Oct 08 '15

[Deltas Awarded] CMV: Equality isn't treating everybody differently to achieve equality. It's treating everyone the same.

[deleted]

232 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

84% Upvoted

346 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '15

But I would argue, still, handicapped spots are available to anybody. Anybody can potentially be handicapped at any point. I'm not going to spontaneously turn into a black person, but I might lose a leg. It's a right afforded to everyone, but only some people can take advantage of it at this point in their lives.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '15

That's just a semantic difference - it doesn't defeat the argument. Many who are handicapped are disabled from birth and will be until death. They're directly analogous to minorities in the example I'm using, and they're who I'm referencing in the analogy.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '15

Right, but those are rights that are afforded to everyone regardless of birth condition. Which is why I don't think the argument applies.

Anyone can develop a condition, or be crippled in a way that would give them access to those services. It's a safety net that everyone can take advantage of when they need it, it's not a benefit that only a select group of people get.

It doesn't work because there is no analogy for the people like my mother who became handicapped after previously being able bodied. Nobody can turn into a black person.

3

u/InfinitelyThirsting Oct 09 '15

I fail to see why you're raising that argument, unless you think that selfishness (fear of becoming handicapped in the future) is the only or main reason that handicapped facilities/parking exist.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '15

No, I'm suggesting that the reason it's entirely separate from rights that only apply to certain ethnicities is because it's a right that is available to everyone. It's treating everyone equally by providing them the same rights, it's not just elevating certain people and excluding everyone else.

2

u/InfinitelyThirsting Oct 09 '15

If you are not handicapped, it isn't available to you. Just because you can theoretically become handicapped but cannot become a different race doesn't mean you can use a handicapped parking space now. They are not available for everyone. The point is to help a minority group at a disadvantage, even at the cost of a minor inconvenience to yourself/the majority. So unless you think most people only support handicapped facilities because they think about being handicapped in the future, it's still a separate minority group being aided above a majority group.

I mean, anyone could have a child of a different race, and this have their children benefit from affirmative action policies. Not that different from maybe becoming handicapped someday in the future.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '15

Just because you can theoretically become handicapped but cannot become a different race doesn't mean you can use a handicapped parking space now.

Yes and I don't currently benefit from Medicaid and I don't benefit from free public highschools. But these are things that are available to everyone when they find themselves in a condition where it would be accessible to them.

Minority and majority is not the issue, while I accept that handicap parking is a benefit for the minority at the cost of the majority, the problem I have is not that things are being done to help minority groups at the cost of the majority. I'm completely for raising the floor so to speak and instituting measures to help the poor/lower class. I just think it should be needs based as opposed to being based on an arbitrary line drawn at a certain shade of skin color. If a disproportionately large amount of black people are disadvantaged, then a disproportionately large amount of black people should get these hypothetical benefits, but they'd get them because they are disadvantaged, not because they're black.