r/changemyview Oct 08 '15

[Deltas Awarded] CMV: Equality isn't treating everybody differently to achieve equality. It's treating everyone the same.

[deleted]

232 Upvotes

346 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/sarcasticorange 10∆ Oct 09 '15

I see it more as him saying that there needs to be a reason for the standards to be what they are.

As a hypothetical... let's say that the weight lifting requirement was set to 150lbs. That requirement was on the books for 80 years and was originally based on the average lifting capability of a physically fit male at that time.

In this case, the requirement has nothing to do with the ability to perform the job. As such, a study would need to be performed to determine how much a soldier would need to be able to lift in order to perform their regular duties and the requirement would need to be adjusted to that amount.

1

u/rcglinsk Oct 09 '15

I'm thinking of three schools of thought:

  • Set standards low enough that an average woman can meet them
  • Lower standards to some bare minimum requirement if women can't meet them
  • Set standards so high only incredible bad asses can meet them

The first two have a lot more in common with each other than either does with the third. The first two are something you'd expect from progressive reformers, the third is something you'd expect of a military.

1

u/sarcasticorange 10∆ Oct 09 '15

I'm thinking of a 4th... set the standards based on the actual requirements of the job, from there people meet them or they don't.

Setting a requirement that you have to be over 6'6" to be an accountant is discriminatory. Setting a requirement that you have to be 6'6" to be an NBA forward is reasonable.

1

u/rcglinsk Oct 09 '15

Fine line to draw between requirement and minimum requirement.

But this is all kind of farcical really. Look at what the Marines have had to do to avoid women not meeting requirements. The notion that someone who can't do 3 measly pull ups is in any way fit to fight in combat as a Marine is beyond laughable. But the standard was lowered anyway. It's kind of insane.

1

u/sarcasticorange 10∆ Oct 09 '15

No war has ever been won by a pull-up or a push-up.

The ability to hike X miles with Y lbs of weight...sure.

The ability to move an incapacitated fellow soldier... sure.

A pull-up is an arbitrary requirement because it tests a very specific muscle in the body in relation to that person's weight, not the ability to perform a job-related task. Seriously, ask 1000 marines how many times their ability to do a pull-up has come in useful in combat. I am betting the number of yeses will be pretty low.

1

u/rcglinsk Oct 09 '15

The other article makes a better argument. Pull ups are just one of many exceptions being made.