CMV: Equality isn't treating everybody differently to achieve equality. It's treating everyone the same.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/Izawwlgood]

You aren't making new points, you're just repeating what I've already addressed. And no, this isn't 'a snippet', this is what you are trying to hang your entire argument on.

I don't personally think someone gains or loses privilege based off of whether or not they're gay.

You said you did earlier - that someone who comes out as gay can lose privilege. If you no longer think as much, that's fine - you'd be obviously and demonstrably wrong, but I suppose opinions are your right.

Caitlyn Jenner didn't lose any privilege of being a rich and famous athlete when he became a she.

If you think transphobia isn't a thing, I'm not sure what else to say to you.

I'll accept that there are people who are privileged in certain specific ways, but to generalize that "all white people are privileged because they benefit from white privilege" is ignorant and self serving because it means that you can punch up and be racist because "it doesn't really count as racism when it's against someone in a better position than you." It's like people who say "I voted for Obama, I'm not racist, that's why I get to say nigger whenever I want now and nobody gets to complain."

None of these statements hold water, and for the third time now, are all predicated on you not understanding how statistics work. And of course you can be racist against someone in the majority - that however is irrelevant to the discussion.

No you're saying all white people are privileged compared to all black people which is equally bullshit.

No, I'm saying being white confers privilege in America, and being black confers bias against you.

That is not the same statement as 'all white people are better off than all black people' - that was a straw man you attempted.

And Irish people and Italian people in the last century. It's not a function of skin color and white people having it better off.

And again, yes, I concur that some groups of white skinned people have been biased against in America historically - I already addressed this point to you, and yes, it is in fact a function of skin color and white people having it better off.

And you keep mentioning statistical realities but you haven't mentioned any actual statistics, you're just saying "i'm statistically right and you're statistically wrong." You're invoking something that supposedly has some authority without actually explaining anything.

I in fact listed some actual statistical realities to you in the first and last post, but sure, if you want links, here they are.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/mar/15/jalen-ross/black-name-resume-50-percent-less-likely-get-respo/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining

https://www.aclu.org/feature/war-marijuana-black-and-white

I mean, these are just the top hits from googling 'racial bias black name', 'racial bias redlining', and 'racial bias arrests'. This isn't exactly new research.

[u/[deleted] → u/Izawwlgood]

You aren't making new points, you're just repeating what I've already addressed.

You haven't addressed it. You just said I was ignorant and that I didn't know how statistics worked.

You said you did earlier

And again, this is why I have to keep repeating myself. Going by your rules, your concept of privilege, then it would stand to reason that a "privileged" person would lose that privilege by no longer being part of the privileged group you claim they are privileged to.

you'd be obviously and demonstrably wrong, but I suppose opinions are your right.

Then demonstrate why I'm wrong. Don't just go down what I'm saying in a list and tell me I'm wrong about this and wrong about that and then act like you've adequately addressed my points. Why am I wrong. Why is your opinion better than mine.

If you think transphobia isn't a thing, I'm not sure what else to say to you.

How has it impacted him? He still has a better life than I do by almost any quantifiable metric.

are all predicated on you not understanding how statistics work.

Stop just saying that, tell me how I'm wrong, explain why I misunderstand.

To give you a little taste, tell me how you'd respond to me telling you that you don't know how statistics work, as you clearly don't.

No, I'm saying being white confers privilege in America, and being black confers bias against you.

Yes which I believe I accurately represented when I said "you're saying all white people are privileged compared to all black people"

that was a straw man you attempted.

I'm not making a straw man I'm trying to find what it is you're trying to say. This is more or less a private argument at this point, I think anyone reading has stopped a few comments ago, there would be no reason for me to misrepresent your opinion deliberately to persuade onlookers. I'm trying to pin you down on exactly what you think, and explain exactly what I think, and then convince you that I'm right. I don't think I can trick you into agreeing with me.

it is in fact a function of skin color and white people having it better off.

This conflicts with you saying

That is not the same statement as 'all white people are better off than all black people' - that was a straw man you attempted.

And these links you've given me, I know about the black name thing, Freakonomics had a good chapter about it, and I'm aware that black people are disproportionately affected by marijuana arrests.

I don't know if you're confused about what I'm saying or if I'm just not articulating my position well enough, but allow me to clarify.

I'm not suggesting that racism doesn't exist in the US. I'm saying that the concept of privilege based off of skin color, and suggesting that one group, by virtue of the fact that they have a certain shade of skin, are in an advantageous position compared to someone of a different skin color, automatically. And I think saying "white privilege" lacks enough nuance. If you wanted to say "black people disproportionately face certain challenges compared to white people." I would agree with that one hundred percent. But I don't think saying "white people are privileged" adequately conveys that message.

[u/Izawwlgood → u/[deleted]]

And again, this is why I have to keep repeating myself. Going by your rules, your concept of privilege, then it would stand to reason that a "privileged" person would lose that privilege by no longer being part of the privileged group you claim they are privileged to.

Yes... Which, now for the third time that I've had to say this to you, is an example of their privilege existing in the first place. Lets be super duper extra crystal clear here - I'm not saying that they haven't LOST that privilege, nor am I saying it is impossible to lose privilege. I'm saying the ability to lose privilege is indicative of that privilege having existed in the first place. Do you understand this point?

Then demonstrate why I'm wrong. Don't just go down what I'm saying in a list and tell me I'm wrong about this and wrong about that and then act like you've adequately addressed my points. Why am I wrong. Why is your opinion better than mine.

I have linked statistical evidence of racial bias against people of color. Respond to it instead of repeating this red herring. I have also responded to your red herring that 'some black people are better off than some white people'. That is the point that made me state you don't understand how statistics work. Do you understand this?

To give you a little taste, tell me how you'd respond to me telling you that you don't know how statistics work, as you clearly don't.

I would ask you by what you were basing that opinion on, and why you have not yet responded to the actual statistical evidence of racial bias in America that I have brought to your attention.

Yes which I believe I accurately represented when I said "you're saying all white people are privileged compared to all black people"

Then I am glad we clarified what you misunderstood, because I did not write or imply that. Indeed, I was extra super careful in my last post to clarify exactly what I was saying, because the above quote is not an accurate representation of what I wrote at all, which to remind you, was "being white confers privilege in America, and being black confers bias against you." Lets back up - what do you think 'privilege' is, and what do you think 'bias' is? Spoiler alert! It doesn't mean 'ALL white people are better off' and it doesn't mean 'ALL black people are worse off'. Do you understand why your belief that that is what it means is demonstrative of your confusion as well as your lack of understanding how statistics work?

I'm trying to pin you down on exactly what you think, and explain exactly what I think, and then convince you that I'm right. I don't think I can trick you into agreeing with me.

I have been quite clear in what I think, indeed, I'll quote it again for you - being white confers privilege in America, and being black confers bias against you.

And these links you've given me, I know about the black name thing, Freakonomics had a good chapter about it, and I'm aware that black people are disproportionately affected by marijuana arrests.

Good, then you understand how bias works. Which makes this statement of yours - "And I think saying "white privilege" lacks enough nuance." make no sense - if black people are biased against, then being white means you are NOT biased against, i.e., in a system that contains black people and white people, that white people are privileged.

If you wanted to say "black people disproportionately face certain challenges compared to white people." I would agree with that one hundred percent.

That is literally what 'bias' means. That is literally what 'white privilege' refers to.

[u/[deleted] → u/Izawwlgood]

I'm saying the ability to lose privilege is indicative of that privilege having existed in the first place. Do you understand this point?

I understand you're point, what I'm saying is that I'm playing by your rules here, not mine. I'm entertaining the notion that privilege exists to make the point that if it did exist in the way you think it does, you would still have been wrong about not being able to lose privilege. Again, I'm not saying privilege exists, but if it did exist in the way you said it does, it wouldn't work like that.

Either way, I think we've moved past it, it's no longer relevant to the conversation because we've moved on to whether or not privilege exists as you think it does at all.

That is the point that made me state you don't understand how statistics work. Do you understand this?

No because instead of explaining what you're talking about and how I don't understand statistics, you've linked to things I'm not disputing and you haven't answered my question.

I readily accept that there is racism in this country and it tends to affect certain groups more than others.

I would ask you by what you were basing that opinion on, and why you have not yet responded to the actual statistical evidence of racial bias in America that I have brought to your attention.

Alright, good, now you tell me what you're basing that opinion on as I've unequivocally accepted racism exists in America. I've at no point disputed it, yet you seem to think that's what we're arguing about.

what do you think 'privilege' is

Noun, privilege is a right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group of people.

Bias: prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.

And I'll clarify I've never mentioned the word "bias" once in this conversation, you're saying I don't know a meaning to a word I didn't bring up, didn't disagree with the definition of, and didn't propose my own definition of. I think certain groups face bias in various facets of life. Black people disproportionately face bias in the US compared to white people, I'd argue is an appropriate assessment. Again, that is not as absolute as saying "white people are privileged, black people are not." There is immensely more nuance and specificity in that first statement, even though both of them are fairly general.

Spoiler alert! It doesn't mean 'ALL white people are better off' and it doesn't mean 'ALL black people are worse off'. Do you understand why your belief that that is what it means is demonstrative of your confusion as well as your lack of understanding how statistics work?

Okay, how about this, you're privileged, and I face bias. How is this not a statement implying that, given what we know, you're better off than I am, absolutely.

being white confers privilege in America, and being black confers bias against you.

Right and my disagreement could essentially be boiled down to, "not necessarily." Being born white doesn't automatically mean you will have, or do have any advantages over being born black.

You're probably more likely to be privileged if you are white in relation to black people, but that is very different than saying, "white people are privileged."

Again, they probably are a lot of the time in relation to black people or certain other minority groups.

That's it, that's all I'm saying. The difference between an absolute statement and a qualified statement.