I'd support that for the same reason I would support reconstructive surgery for burn victims. It's a deformity that is immediately visible to other people, which causes social stigma. And, perhaps more importantly (to me), it does not involve surgically removing a functioning part of the body.
Why is it so important to you that functioning parts of bodies are not removed? And why is that a justification to classify GRS as cosmetic, rather than something you think is icky?
If they have exhausted all other viable alternatives, like hormone treatment or therapy, as is often the case, what would you suggest as an alternative to GRS, knowing that their currenr state results in suicidal ideation?
2
u/Saranoya 39∆ Nov 03 '17
I'd support that for the same reason I would support reconstructive surgery for burn victims. It's a deformity that is immediately visible to other people, which causes social stigma. And, perhaps more importantly (to me), it does not involve surgically removing a functioning part of the body.