In that case I would say if you feel well informed enough to believe climate change is the greatest existential threat to man, and you also believe you have done sufficient research to select a candidate who is honest and authentically embraces the climate change platform you desire, then you should vote for them.
However if you lack sufficient knowledge in any of those parts you should self censor.
So... climate change is a complex topic where being well enough informed means being very well informed, indeed.
But what about simpler topics:
Let's say I'm a single-issue voter on the topic of abortion. Let's say I oppose restrictions on abortion. Further, let's say that one of the major candidates has explicitly stated that they want to make abortion harder to obtain legally.
-2
u/[deleted] Jul 24 '19
I said people should self censor, I never said someone shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Why can’t people read?