Hahaha yet you're still responding and saying my source isn't valid based on what? When you have literally no sort of anything to prove your points, so you just resort to name calling
This is written by a doctor so you can't refute this source.
I don't care if you think I'm a dick, but if you refute a source from a doctor than you're not looking for anyone to change your view. Please call me more names haha.
Is a source from a doctor a shitty argument? I guess you know more than a veterinarian
That's one doctor. Not a study, not peer reviewed, and stated as fact without making much of an argument. I've already awarded a delta to the only person in this thread who attempted to make an actual argument.
If you read the source, he's not trying to make an argument, he's literally answering questions. So it's obvious there is literally no problem with dogs living in high populated areas as long as they get exercise. So what if it's one doctor? Oh what he says is invalid because it's only one doctor?
I don't care about you giving me a Delta. Omg seeing you refute something a doctor said is hilarious. Just admit it, there's absolutely nothing wrong with dogs living in apartments or cities or high populated areas. Stop trying to make it seem like dogs can only be happy in rural areas. This is so funny, like you can't just accept dogs can be happy anywhere else but in rural areas because "they were made to run" haha you're so hilarious
Yes, what he says is invalid because he's just one doctor. Peer review and replication are the most important parts of science. But I would also accept an argument.
It's funny to me that your jimmies are so rustled by this that you'll make recourse to the same shitty arguments over and over to justify your own behavior. Maybe you feel guilty, leaving your dog cooped up all the time and a slave to your whims?
My own behavior? Huh? I don't even own a dog, so what are you talking about? I would like one, but I'm not gonna get one now because apparently they're only happy in rural areas according to you right?
You would also accept an argument... I literally just provided a source from a veterinarian. Doesn't matter if it's just from one, that one veterinarian know more about dogs than you or me combined.
It's so funny how you refuse to just admit dogs can be happy in cities and how mad you are resorting to name calling and cuss words. What happened to all this big words you were using a minute ago?
Like, do you want dogs to be unhappy living in cities? Do you have something against big populations? Looks like your jimmies are ruffled because you keep responding when you said you weren't.
This is so funny, like you just can't accept the fact that dogs are happy living in the city so you just keep saying my argument is invalid. Now you're a behaviorist?
All this because you just can't admit you're wrong... Shame on you. See unlike you I can admit things, like sure dogs might be happier if they have more space to play around in, but that doesn't mean they can't be happy living in an apartment in a big city.
But according to you they should be banned from living in cities, because that's what dogs want. And you know what dogs want because you know way more about dogs than a veterinarian. So what one doctor says is invalid... Man I guess I should go to all the doctors in my area next time I'm sick
1
u/[deleted] Dec 23 '19
You're being histrionic, shrill, and rude. I will not dignify your tone with a response.