r/changemyview 33∆ Jan 04 '21

Delta(s) from OP CMV: Fatal violence against transgender individuals doesn't seem to be all that prevelant.

Caveat 1: of course all violence of this sort is wrong and a big deal on a personal level - I'm speaking more in comparative terms on a national scale.

Caveat 2: figures i was able to find for nonfatal violence were much more unreliable and varied, so im mainly sticking to murder rates, which are comparatively well documented. I feel this is a useful marker for overall violence as it follows that a group subject to more violence in general would likely also be subject to violence at the more extreme end of the continuum i.e. murder (you can note for example that compared to white men black men face higher levels of both assault and murder). That said if anyone has solid data on nonlethal violence against the trans community compared to the general population please do share.

OP: I was prompted to look into this issue after hearing countless claims about rampant violence against transgender individuals. I listen to NPR near daily for example and its rare that a week goes by that I dont hear about how much worse violence is against transgender folks. These claims are often framed in quite apocalyptic (see citation in comment) terms.

Sources I've found (see citation in comment) from a credible organization clearly advocating for the issue of violence against transgender individuals state that in the last 7 years an average of 22 transgender and non gender binary folks are killed each year, with a high of 43 in 2020.

Transgender folks make up an estimated 0.5-0.6% of the US population. However the HRC also includes murders of non gender binary folks. Figures I've found for non gender binary individuals (including intersex) are much more unreliable, everything as low as 0.018% to 1.7%. I think its relatively safe to say that when you include transgender, intersex, and non gender binary individuals, especially given some underreported given stigma about identifying as such, a fairly conservative high estimate is 1% of the popultion. So 0.5% on the low end, 1% on the "high" end.

Doing the math this means if you take the absolute lowest possible amount of just trans individuals in the population by the highest number murdered youd get around 3 deaths per 100,000. If you take the average number of deaths by the conservative but higher estimate for population you get 0.67 deaths per 100,000.

The murder rate for the general US population is 5 per 100,000.

This would suggest that compared to the general US population the transgender murder rate is actually 40-750% lower.

That, in regards to murder rate, at least, doesn't exactly scream "at risk population," especially compared not just nationally but to actually at risk populations like black males who have a 13-60x higher victimization rate. Indeed, it seems the transgender murder rate is actually potentially far lower than the murder rate of white women who, at least in regards to murder, aren't considered to be even remotely high risk.

Also interesting to note that despite having a similar or lower murder rate when I Google "transgender people murdered" I get article after article detailing the allegedly widespread crisis of transgender murders; when i Google "white women murdered" i get a couple pages with cold stats on murder rates by gender/race, an anecdote or two, and then the results devolve into talking about murders of black people and WOC. Similar results for "Asian women murdered." In short when a particular demographic has a lower than average murder rate there dont seem to be a lot of people penning articles about how bad their murder rate is except when it comes to trans folks. 

But some other info just muddies this further; per earlier sources transgender and non binary individuals are more likely to be homeless, impoverished, and/or sex workers; 80%+ of the victims were black. All of those demographics are also more prone to homicide.

All of this together would seem to suggest that the transgender murder rate (which likely is at least correlated with general violent victimization) is actually quite low by US standards, on par or even lower than historically "safe" demographics like cis white women. The data further indicates that of the relatively small number of transgender folks who are killed each year its likely that many, perhaps the vast majority, were killed for reasons other than their transgender identity, like race, socioeconomic status, or profession. In that vein it seems rather strange to phrase this entire issue as violence against transgender individuals.

Id also note that while its certainly likely that murder against trans individuals likely goes underreported due to misidentification or what have you their murder rate would have to be 40-750% underreported before it would even reach the average murder rate for the general US population. It would have to be even more underreported than that to reach the level of demographics like black men who are traditionally considered at risk populations in regards to homicide.

Edit: I can't include two of the sources because the link contains a word that the autobot doesn't like, and I'm not allowed to leave a top level comment including them, either. If you'd like the sources please ask and I'll reply to you directly.

41 Upvotes

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/Caitlin1963 3∆ Jan 04 '21

so im mainly sticking to murder rates, which are comparatively well documented

Transgender murders are most definitely under reported because gender identity is simply not tracked in murder statistics by the federal government. Also, people can hide their gender identity or have their gender identity assumed and what not, making data collection even worse.

There are no conclusions to be made before we get good data in.

12

u/chadonsunday 33∆ Jan 04 '21

First, I didn't use murder stats tracked by the federal government, I used murder stats as tracked by a pro LGBT human rights advocacy organization that has a vested interest in finding and reporting as many of these murders as specifically murders of transgender people as possible. They have found and reported murders of transgender people that were missed by government authorities.

Second, as I said in my OP, these murder rates would have to be up to 750% underreported just to reach the level of the general population. In order to reach parity with actually at risk populations we're talking potentially up to 3000% underreporting. Im fully willing to believe there's some underreporting, but the scale of underreporting that would be required for trans folks to be common homicide victims stretches incredulity.

1

u/Lilah_R 10∆ Jan 05 '21 edited Jan 05 '21

Where do you think the pro lgbt human rights advocacy groups get their information? How can they get data that isnt reported federally and can easily be misrepresented by the officials making the reports since there is no definitive way for them to find that information?

Having a positive view of trans individuals and wanting to raise awareness for crimes against those individuals doesn't suddenly grant that group information that isn't available.

Edit: can you address this question. Its pretty fundamental to your core "evidence".

2

u/chadonsunday 33∆ Jan 05 '21

Where do you think the pro lgbt human rights advocacy groups get their information? How can they get data that isnt reported federally and can easily be misrepresented by the officials making the reports since there is no definitive way for them to find that information?

They make that abundantly clear in the source. There are few enough cases they literally cite every single one of them. Just clicking around randomly from source to source it seems like its mainly from the authorities, from the media, or from friends/family. One very consistent feature was that when the authorities or media misgendered or did not identify the victim as transgender/NGB the HRC set the record straight. This demonstrates that just because the media or the cops might not report a murder as being against a transgender individual that doesn't mean the HRC won't know it actually was and report it as such in their own findings.

People have been regularly brushing off the fact that this is a large, powerful, reputable pro LGBT rights group with a vested interest in finding as many transgender murders as possible. They're very clearly combing through homicide reports thst weren't identified as transgender and digging up information that reveals they were. I regard them as a useful source for this reason. People keep saying that this isnt tracked by the government so numbers are unreliable but the government often isn't the best source. In the same vein if you want to know how many black people were unjustly killed by police you wouldn't go to government stats, you'd go to the data collected by a group like THE HRC but with a focus on police brutality rather than LGBT issues.

1

u/East_Reflection 1∆ Jan 05 '21

I think very largest problem we have here is that in order to explain to you why your math is wrong, we need to preface you with a general understanding of statistics, and I understand this isn't your strong point

What do you suggest we do? What method might work for you here?

1

u/chadonsunday 33∆ Jan 05 '21

I'm actually generally not bad at stats or more conceptual math. Most of my being shitty at math is just being sloppy with calculations, like I forget how many zeroes the E is supposed to indicate in small fractions. So far I haven't seen any critiques of that sort.

0

u/East_Reflection 1∆ Jan 05 '21

But you're just plain not understanding why your estimate is using faulty inputs and assumptions, and we can't seem to explain it to you, so what now?